-moz-document domain(movq.de)
{
div { border: 1px solid red; }
}
Either way, I love that I don’t need a plugin for that. 🥳
-moz-document domain(movq.de)
{
div { border: 1px solid red; }
}
Either way, I love that I don’t need a plugin for that. 🥳
-moz-document domain(movq.de)
{
div { border: 1px solid red; }
}
Either way, I love that I don’t need a plugin for that. 🥳
-moz-document domain(movq.de)
{
div { border: 1px solid red; }
}
Either way, I love that I don’t need a plugin for that. 🥳
Looks like FreeCAD works fine and I think this is a more appropriate program anyway. 😊
Looks like FreeCAD works fine and I think this is a more appropriate program anyway. 😊
Looks like FreeCAD works fine and I think this is a more appropriate program anyway. 😊
Looks like FreeCAD works fine and I think this is a more appropriate program anyway. 😊


I didn’t end up using that, either. 🥴
In general, I print very little. So little that some of my supplies have simply gone bad, like that “3D LAC” (sprayable glue).
@aelaraji Yeah, I saw that when googling the issue. I’m on Linux, there are no DLLs to swap. I could use an older version indeed. 🤔 Let’s see if I can find some better alternative first. (Let’s face it, Blender is hard to use.)


I didn’t end up using that, either. 🥴
In general, I print very little. So little that some of my supplies have simply gone bad, like that “3D LAC” (sprayable glue).
@aelaraji Yeah, I saw that when googling the issue. I’m on Linux, there are no DLLs to swap. I could use an older version indeed. 🤔 Let’s see if I can find some better alternative first. (Let’s face it, Blender is hard to use.)


I didn’t end up using that, either. 🥴
In general, I print very little. So little that some of my supplies have simply gone bad, like that “3D LAC” (sprayable glue).
@aelaraji Yeah, I saw that when googling the issue. I’m on Linux, there are no DLLs to swap. I could use an older version indeed. 🤔 Let’s see if I can find some better alternative first. (Let’s face it, Blender is hard to use.)


I didn’t end up using that, either. 🥴
In general, I print very little. So little that some of my supplies have simply gone bad, like that “3D LAC” (sprayable glue).
@aelaraji Yeah, I saw that when googling the issue. I’m on Linux, there are no DLLs to swap. I could use an older version indeed. 🤔 Let’s see if I can find some better alternative first. (Let’s face it, Blender is hard to use.)

A bit annoying, but not much of a problem. The only thing I did with Blender was make some very simple 3D-printable objects.
I’ll have a look at the alternatives out there. Worst case is I go back to Art of Illusion, which I used heavily ~15 years ago.~

A bit annoying, but not much of a problem. The only thing I did with Blender was make some very simple 3D-printable objects.
I’ll have a look at the alternatives out there. Worst case is I go back to Art of Illusion, which I used heavily ~15 years ago.~

A bit annoying, but not much of a problem. The only thing I did with Blender was make some very simple 3D-printable objects.
I’ll have a look at the alternatives out there. Worst case is I go back to Art of Illusion, which I used heavily ~15 years ago.~

A bit annoying, but not much of a problem. The only thing I did with Blender was make some very simple 3D-printable objects.
I’ll have a look at the alternatives out there. Worst case is I go back to Art of Illusion, which I used heavily ~15 years ago.~
$ printf '\xC2\xB9, \xC2\xBC, \xD9\xA4, \xE1\xAA\x96, \xE3\x8D\xA4, \xDB\xB0, \xE2\x9D\xBB, \xE2\x91\xB9, 1' | grep -o '[0-9]'
¹
¼
٤
᪖
㍤
۰
❻
⑹
1
Sad that it doesn’t match on
ⅵ
.Confused by:
$ printf '\xE2\x9D\xBB, \xE2\x91\xB9, 1' | grep -o '[1-6]'
1
$ printf '\xE2\x9D\xBB, \xE2\x91\xB9, 1' | grep -o '[1-7]'
❻
⑹
1
So
❻
and ⑹
are a 7?Still haven’t dug up why it needs the extra ASCII
1
for anything to match. Maybe tomorrow.
$ printf '\\xC2\\xB9, \\xC2\\xBC, \\xD9\\xA4, \\xE1\\xAA\\x96, \\xE3\\x8D\\xA4, \\xDB\\xB0, \\xE2\\x9D\\xBB, \\xE2\\x91\\xB9, 1' | grep -o '[0-9]'
¹
¼
٤
᪖
㍤
۰
❻
⑹
1
Sad that it doesn’t match on
ⅵ
.Confused by:
$ printf '\\xE2\\x9D\\xBB, \\xE2\\x91\\xB9, 1' | grep -o '[1-6]'
1
$ printf '\\xE2\\x9D\\xBB, \\xE2\\x91\\xB9, 1' | grep -o '[1-7]'
❻
⑹
1
So
❻
and ⑹
are a 7?Still haven’t dug up why it needs the extra ASCII
1
for anything to match. Maybe tomorrow.
$ printf '\xC2\xB9, \xC2\xBC, \xD9\xA4, \xE1\xAA\x96, \xE3\x8D\xA4, \xDB\xB0, \xE2\x9D\xBB, \xE2\x91\xB9, 1' | grep -o '[0-9]'
¹
¼
٤
᪖
㍤
۰
❻
⑹
1
Sad that it doesn’t match on
ⅵ
.Confused by:
$ printf '\xE2\x9D\xBB, \xE2\x91\xB9, 1' | grep -o '[1-6]'
1
$ printf '\xE2\x9D\xBB, \xE2\x91\xB9, 1' | grep -o '[1-7]'
❻
⑹
1
So
❻
and ⑹
are a 7?Still haven’t dug up why it needs the extra ASCII
1
for anything to match. Maybe tomorrow.
$ printf '\xC2\xB9, \xC2\xBC, \xD9\xA4, \xE1\xAA\x96, \xE3\x8D\xA4, \xDB\xB0, \xE2\x9D\xBB, \xE2\x91\xB9, 1' | grep -o '[0-9]'
¹
¼
٤
᪖
㍤
۰
❻
⑹
1
Sad that it doesn’t match on
ⅵ
.Confused by:
$ printf '\xE2\x9D\xBB, \xE2\x91\xB9, 1' | grep -o '[1-6]'
1
$ printf '\xE2\x9D\xBB, \xE2\x91\xB9, 1' | grep -o '[1-7]'
❻
⑹
1
So
❻
and ⑹
are a 7?Still haven’t dug up why it needs the extra ASCII
1
for anything to match. Maybe tomorrow.
I only get to enjoy fast and snappy UIs in my free time when I’m doing hobby stuff. You’d expect it to be the other way around. 🙄
I only get to enjoy fast and snappy UIs in my free time when I’m doing hobby stuff. You’d expect it to be the other way around. 🙄
I only get to enjoy fast and snappy UIs in my free time when I’m doing hobby stuff. You’d expect it to be the other way around. 🙄
I only get to enjoy fast and snappy UIs in my free time when I’m doing hobby stuff. You’d expect it to be the other way around. 🙄
https://movq.de/v/e14086cc1c/MVI_8057.MOV.mp4
It’s for day 8. Don’t look if you don’t want to get spoiled. If you don’t know the puzzle, you’ll hardly understand what this is doing – but it’s fancy and colorful and fun to look at, right? 😅
This is Java 1 (AWT) running on a Pentium 133 on OS/2 Warp 4.
https://movq.de/v/e14086cc1c/MVI_8057.MOV.mp4
It’s for day 8. Don’t look if you don’t want to get spoiled. If you don’t know the puzzle, you’ll hardly understand what this is doing – but it’s fancy and colorful and fun to look at, right? 😅
This is Java 1 (AWT) running on a Pentium 133 on OS/2 Warp 4.
https://movq.de/v/e14086cc1c/MVI_8057.MOV.mp4
It’s for day 8. Don’t look if you don’t want to get spoiled. If you don’t know the puzzle, you’ll hardly understand what this is doing – but it’s fancy and colorful and fun to look at, right? 😅
This is Java 1 (AWT) running on a Pentium 133 on OS/2 Warp 4.
https://movq.de/v/e14086cc1c/MVI_8057.MOV.mp4
It’s for day 8. Don’t look if you don’t want to get spoiled. If you don’t know the puzzle, you’ll hardly understand what this is doing – but it’s fancy and colorful and fun to look at, right? 😅
This is Java 1 (AWT) running on a Pentium 133 on OS/2 Warp 4.
https://old.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/1h9cub8/discussion_on_llm_cheaters/
And they don’t even try to hide it anymore.
At this point, any kind of speed contest or ranking has become meaningless. Seeing this kind of behavior is sad and probably unavoidable, because there will always be a few who spoil things for everyone.
The only way going forward, I can think of, is to remove the global ranking and just have private leaderboards. Basically what these two people have said:
- https://old.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/1h9cub8/discussion_on_llm_cheaters/m0zzfb1/
- https://old.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/1h9cub8/discussion_on_llm_cheaters/m0zyswh/
Cheaters won’t get public attention anymore. AoC won’t be “officially” ruined by cheaters anymore. If you want to do a speed contest, you can still do that in private leaderboards.
(Honestly, I’d prefer it if AoC didn’t have any kind of ranking anyway. I’m not *really* fast enough to compete, but it’s always at the back of my head. And last year I made rank 116 once, so it’s not completely impossible. All this creates a lot of pressure that I have to fight and try to ignore. 🤣)
https://old.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/1h9cub8/discussion_on_llm_cheaters/
And they don’t even try to hide it anymore.
At this point, any kind of speed contest or ranking has become meaningless. Seeing this kind of behavior is sad and probably unavoidable, because there will always be a few who spoil things for everyone.
The only way going forward, I can think of, is to remove the global ranking and just have private leaderboards. Basically what these two people have said:
- https://old.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/1h9cub8/discussion_on_llm_cheaters/m0zzfb1/
- https://old.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/1h9cub8/discussion_on_llm_cheaters/m0zyswh/
Cheaters won’t get public attention anymore. AoC won’t be “officially” ruined by cheaters anymore. If you want to do a speed contest, you can still do that in private leaderboards.
(Honestly, I’d prefer it if AoC didn’t have any kind of ranking anyway. I’m not *really* fast enough to compete, but it’s always at the back of my head. And last year I made rank 116 once, so it’s not completely impossible. All this creates a lot of pressure that I have to fight and try to ignore. 🤣)
https://old.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/1h9cub8/discussion_on_llm_cheaters/
And they don’t even try to hide it anymore.
At this point, any kind of speed contest or ranking has become meaningless. Seeing this kind of behavior is sad and probably unavoidable, because there will always be a few who spoil things for everyone.
The only way going forward, I can think of, is to remove the global ranking and just have private leaderboards. Basically what these two people have said:
- https://old.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/1h9cub8/discussion_on_llm_cheaters/m0zzfb1/
- https://old.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/1h9cub8/discussion_on_llm_cheaters/m0zyswh/
Cheaters won’t get public attention anymore. AoC won’t be “officially” ruined by cheaters anymore. If you want to do a speed contest, you can still do that in private leaderboards.
(Honestly, I’d prefer it if AoC didn’t have any kind of ranking anyway. I’m not *really* fast enough to compete, but it’s always at the back of my head. And last year I made rank 116 once, so it’s not completely impossible. All this creates a lot of pressure that I have to fight and try to ignore. 🤣)
https://old.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/1h9cub8/discussion_on_llm_cheaters/
And they don’t even try to hide it anymore.
At this point, any kind of speed contest or ranking has become meaningless. Seeing this kind of behavior is sad and probably unavoidable, because there will always be a few who spoil things for everyone.
The only way going forward, I can think of, is to remove the global ranking and just have private leaderboards. Basically what these two people have said:
- https://old.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/1h9cub8/discussion_on_llm_cheaters/m0zzfb1/
- https://old.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/1h9cub8/discussion_on_llm_cheaters/m0zyswh/
Cheaters won’t get public attention anymore. AoC won’t be “officially” ruined by cheaters anymore. If you want to do a speed contest, you can still do that in private leaderboards.
(Honestly, I’d prefer it if AoC didn’t have any kind of ranking anyway. I’m not *really* fast enough to compete, but it’s always at the back of my head. And last year I made rank 116 once, so it’s not completely impossible. All this creates a lot of pressure that I have to fight and try to ignore. 🤣)
> “A minimalist social network powered by plain text files”
My brain keeps shortening this to “a socialist network …” and then jumps to “uhh, large parts of the US won’t like this” … 🤦🤪
> “A minimalist social network powered by plain text files”
My brain keeps shortening this to “a socialist network …” and then jumps to “uhh, large parts of the US won’t like this” … 🤦🤪
> “A minimalist social network powered by plain text files”
My brain keeps shortening this to “a socialist network …” and then jumps to “uhh, large parts of the US won’t like this” … 🤦🤪
> “A minimalist social network powered by plain text files”
My brain keeps shortening this to “a socialist network …” and then jumps to “uhh, large parts of the US won’t like this” … 🤦🤪