Yes I have threading on. I wanted to put new posts at the top with set sort_aux = reverse-last-date-sent but that that makes the threads do the newest first not bellow the reply. So all replies are in a top newest order. But I can just use sort date_sent and then go to the end to go to the newest post.=
I saw that but then I refreshed the ublock lists and I could watch.
s/twitter\\.com/nitter.net/
watch did not report back distance, but it was suppose to be by HR anyways so went on that metric. overall great run and was probably able to keep the HR lower just due to it being fucking cold.
#running
watch did not report back distance, but it was suppose to be by HR anyways so went on that metric. overall great run and was probably able to keep the HR lower just due to it being fucking cold.
#running
watch did not report back distance, but it was suppose to be by HR anyways so went on that metric. overall great run and was probably able to keep the HR lower just due to it being fucking cold.
#running
(via)
BD de um tipo que desenha um mosquito morto na mão para depois mandar alta chapada a outro, que se mostra grato quando vê o "mosquito" morto
(via)
BD de um tipo que desenha um mosquito morto na mão para depois mandar alta chapada a outro, que se mostra grato quando vê o "mosquito" morto
set sort = threads
set sort_aux = date-sent
set strict_threads = yes
I find this to be very non-confusing. 🤔
set sort = threads
set sort_aux = date-sent
set strict_threads = yes
I find this to be very non-confusing. 🤔
set sort = threads
set sort_aux = date-sent
set strict_threads = yes
I find this to be very non-confusing. 🤔
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeIkk6Yo0s8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeIkk6Yo0s8
Got token stuff sorted, and posting, next is getting the timeline (and gui for that etc).
(Yes, I know that it’s called “Advent of *Code*”. 😂)
(Yes, I know that it’s called “Advent of *Code*”. 😂)
(Yes, I know that it’s called “Advent of *Code*”. 😂)
double or long double. 😲 I went with long double which has 80 bits even on DOS (63 bits mantissa, I think).(I only wrote a brute-force thingy this morning, so I didn’t even think about doing anything related to polynomials or
double. 😅 Even part 2 only took 55 ms. But for DOS, this wasn’t an option anyway, so I did the proper math while waiting for something at work. 🤣)
It’s still a bit surprising to me. Usually, AoC doesn’t require such tricks and most things fit neatly into 32 bits. Maybe there’s a better solution after all. 🤔 I might have a look at reddit.
double or long double. 😲 I went with long double which has 80 bits even on DOS (63 bits mantissa, I think).(I only wrote a brute-force thingy this morning, so I didn’t even think about doing anything related to polynomials or
double. 😅 Even part 2 only took 55 ms. But for DOS, this wasn’t an option anyway, so I did the proper math while waiting for something at work. 🤣)
It’s still a bit surprising to me. Usually, AoC doesn’t require such tricks and most things fit neatly into 32 bits. Maybe there’s a better solution after all. 🤔 I might have a look at reddit.
double or long double. 😲 I went with long double which has 80 bits even on DOS (63 bits mantissa, I think).(I only wrote a brute-force thingy this morning, so I didn’t even think about doing anything related to polynomials or
double. 😅 Even part 2 only took 55 ms. But for DOS, this wasn’t an option anyway, so I did the proper math while waiting for something at work. 🤣)
It’s still a bit surprising to me. Usually, AoC doesn’t require such tricks and most things fit neatly into 32 bits. Maybe there’s a better solution after all. 🤔 I might have a look at reddit.