Very few people do take pride in building simple, elegant, high-quality systems, do they? Why is that? Why are huge shiny things with tons of features more attractive? đ¤
I never explicitly thought about this, to be honest. It was only at the back of my head. And I never tried to teach our younger âstudentsâ at work: âHey, itâs a great achievement to build something simple and elegant. Thatâs something to be proud of!â
Worse, simple software is often described as âboringâ. Yes, in a way, it is boring, because your brain doesnât have to get into overdrive to understand it. But thatâs exactly the point. And itâs *hard to achieve that*! Simple software isnât just âfewer lines of codeâ, you have to be pretty clever to solve a problem in a simple and elegant way. So itâs something to be proud of.
Could this be an intuitive, *emotional* way to get more people on board the âsimple softwareâ-train? đ¤
Very few people do take pride in building simple, elegant, high-quality systems, do they? Why is that? Why are huge shiny things with tons of features more attractive? đ¤
I never explicitly thought about this, to be honest. It was only at the back of my head. And I never tried to teach our younger âstudentsâ at work: âHey, itâs a great achievement to build something simple and elegant. Thatâs something to be proud of!â
Worse, simple software is often described as âboringâ. Yes, in a way, it is boring, because your brain doesnât have to get into overdrive to understand it. But thatâs exactly the point. And itâs *hard to achieve that*! Simple software isnât just âfewer lines of codeâ, you have to be pretty clever to solve a problem in a simple and elegant way. So itâs something to be proud of.
Could this be an intuitive, *emotional* way to get more people on board the âsimple softwareâ-train? đ¤
Very few people do take pride in building simple, elegant, high-quality systems, do they? Why is that? Why are huge shiny things with tons of features more attractive? đ¤
I never explicitly thought about this, to be honest. It was only at the back of my head. And I never tried to teach our younger âstudentsâ at work: âHey, itâs a great achievement to build something simple and elegant. Thatâs something to be proud of!â
Worse, simple software is often described as âboringâ. Yes, in a way, it is boring, because your brain doesnât have to get into overdrive to understand it. But thatâs exactly the point. And itâs *hard to achieve that*! Simple software isnât just âfewer lines of codeâ, you have to be pretty clever to solve a problem in a simple and elegant way. So itâs something to be proud of.
Could this be an intuitive, *emotional* way to get more people on board the âsimple softwareâ-train? đ¤
Very few people do take pride in building simple, elegant, high-quality systems, do they? Why is that? Why are huge shiny things with tons of features more attractive? đ¤
I never explicitly thought about this, to be honest. It was only at the back of my head. And I never tried to teach our younger âstudentsâ at work: âHey, itâs a great achievement to build something simple and elegant. Thatâs something to be proud of!â
Worse, simple software is often described as âboringâ. Yes, in a way, it is boring, because your brain doesnât have to get into overdrive to understand it. But thatâs exactly the point. And itâs *hard to achieve that*! Simple software isnât just âfewer lines of codeâ, you have to be pretty clever to solve a problem in a simple and elegant way. So itâs something to be proud of.
Could this be an intuitive, *emotional* way to get more people on board the âsimple softwareâ-train? đ¤
Focus on quality, focus on âdoing it rightâ, make that your primary goal. And everything else shall fall into place.
If it only were that simple. đŤ¤đ
Focus on quality, focus on âdoing it rightâ, make that your primary goal. And everything else shall fall into place.
If it only were that simple. đŤ¤đ
Focus on quality, focus on âdoing it rightâ, make that your primary goal. And everything else shall fall into place.
If it only were that simple. đŤ¤đ
Focus on quality, focus on âdoing it rightâ, make that your primary goal. And everything else shall fall into place.
If it only were that simple. đŤ¤đ
But you're right, yarnd has potential for improvement, too (what doesn't?). Rest assured, there are several universes between the two. And yarnd is lightyears ahead.
âJoy of missing outâ, eh? :D
âJoy of missing outâ, eh? :D
âJoy of missing outâ, eh? :D
âJoy of missing outâ, eh? :D
I will not use WhatsApp in a million years. It's not worth it. Might be trickier with family members, but I also refuse to use such stuff. It definitely degrades some friends to aquaintances, but oh well. If I don't know what I'm "missing out" on, then I simply cannot miss it. On the positive side, it frees my time for other things. :-)
yarnd right? đ¤Ł
yarnd right? đ¤Ł
What about Signal? I'm had great success with this, friends, family, neighboards. They get it. It works. I don't have to worry about it too much.
What about Signal? I'm had great success with this, friends, family, neighboards. They get it. It works. I don't have to worry about it too much.
I don't send my bank or insurance company any bug report e-mails or the like. I'm talking about mailing software developers or projects. On a side note, though, I've seen lot of (German) companies use GMail & other terrible mail providers. My former employer fell also in this category (so does my current one, but at least I receive all e-mails).
Iâll probably shut it down.
Nobody cares about privacy. The reasons I bring up in discussions are âtoo nerdyâ. They put *all* their stuff to Google or Apple, so why would messaging be any different? (Weâre not even using all those Matrix crypto stuff ⌠That would be insane.)
Itâs a lost cause. Iâm frustrated.
Will I give in and use WhatsApp instead? Not sure yet.
Iâll probably shut it down.
Nobody cares about privacy. The reasons I bring up in discussions are âtoo nerdyâ. They put *all* their stuff to Google or Apple, so why would messaging be any different? (Weâre not even using all those Matrix crypto stuff ⌠That would be insane.)
Itâs a lost cause. Iâm frustrated.
Will I give in and use WhatsApp instead? Not sure yet.
Iâll probably shut it down.
Nobody cares about privacy. The reasons I bring up in discussions are âtoo nerdyâ. They put *all* their stuff to Google or Apple, so why would messaging be any different? (Weâre not even using all those Matrix crypto stuff ⌠That would be insane.)
Itâs a lost cause. Iâm frustrated.
Will I give in and use WhatsApp instead? Not sure yet.
Iâll probably shut it down.
Nobody cares about privacy. The reasons I bring up in discussions are âtoo nerdyâ. They put *all* their stuff to Google or Apple, so why would messaging be any different? (Weâre not even using all those Matrix crypto stuff ⌠That would be insane.)
Itâs a lost cause. Iâm frustrated.
Will I give in and use WhatsApp instead? Not sure yet.
docker build without any --build-arg VERSION= or --build-arg COMMIT= there was no version information in the built binary and bundled assets. Therefore cache busting would not work as expected. When introducing htmx and hyperscript to create a UI/UX SPA-like experience, this is when things fell apart a bit for you. I think....
docker build without any --build-arg VERSION= or --build-arg COMMIT= there was no version information in the built binary and bundled assets. Therefore cache busting would not work as expected. When introducing htmx and hyperscript to create a UI/UX SPA-like experience, this is when things fell apart a bit for you. I think....
nice session of 10:00 pace for 10 minutes on warm-up and cool-down and threshold at 8:00 pace for 16 minutes.
#running #treadmill
nice session of 10:00 pace for 10 minutes on warm-up and cool-down and threshold at 8:00 pace for 16 minutes.
#running #treadmill
nice session of 10:00 pace for 10 minutes on warm-up and cool-down and threshold at 8:00 pace for 16 minutes.
#running #treadmill
(Praça da República, Porto)
Graffiti a dizer "all cops are bitchs" mas com uma letra ambĂgua
(Praça da República, Porto)
Graffiti a dizer "all cops are bitchs" mas com uma letra ambĂgua
- at the function level you use cyclomatic complexity or how many branches internally and how much you need to keep in mind as it calls out to other functions.
- at a file/module level is a balance of the module doing too much against being so granular that you have cross dependency across modules. I have trouble with keeping things dry at this level because it can lead to parts being so abstract or generalized that it adds complexity.
- at a project level i suppose its a matter of how coupled things are across sub-modules.
- at the function level you use cyclomatic complexity or how many branches internally and how much you need to keep in mind as it calls out to other functions.
- at a file/module level is a balance of the module doing too much against being so granular that you have cross dependency across modules. I have trouble with keeping things dry at this level because it can lead to parts being so abstract or generalized that it adds complexity.
- at a project level i suppose its a matter of how coupled things are across sub-modules.
#catsoftwtxt
#catsoftwtxt
/https://baldo.cat/media/photos/photo_19815-07-2024_17-59-58.jpg) #catsoftwtxt
However you might end up with more questions (complexity?) than answers (simplicity?)
However you might end up with more questions (complexity?) than answers (simplicity?)
However you might end up with more questions (complexity?) than answers (simplicity?)
However you might end up with more questions (complexity?) than answers (simplicity?)
Itâs somewhat telling that the HTMX blogpost also (mostly) only talks about feelings, not hard facts.
Itâs somewhat telling that the HTMX blogpost also (mostly) only talks about feelings, not hard facts.
Itâs somewhat telling that the HTMX blogpost also (mostly) only talks about feelings, not hard facts.
Itâs somewhat telling that the HTMX blogpost also (mostly) only talks about feelings, not hard facts.
Personally, Iâve been doing this for a long time now. Minimal(-ish), slow pace, no pressure. Works quite well for me. The idea isnât very popular, though. đĽ´
Personally, Iâve been doing this for a long time now. Minimal(-ish), slow pace, no pressure. Works quite well for me. The idea isnât very popular, though. đĽ´
Personally, Iâve been doing this for a long time now. Minimal(-ish), slow pace, no pressure. Works quite well for me. The idea isnât very popular, though. đĽ´
Personally, Iâve been doing this for a long time now. Minimal(-ish), slow pace, no pressure. Works quite well for me. The idea isnât very popular, though. đĽ´