yarnd. If there was any poorly worded "things", it was just merely pointing out lacking capabilities for caching and discovery.
yarnd. If there was any poorly worded "things", it was just merely pointing out lacking capabilities for caching and discovery.
> You can take IRC out of my cold 🥶 dead 😵 hands 🙌
> You can take IRC out of my cold 🥶 dead 😵 hands 🙌
LOL, Now substitute IRC and Discord with
Gopher/Gemini and Web.I hope you get the joke 😅***
LOL, Now substitute IRC and Discord with
Gopher/Gemini and Web.I hope you get the joke 😅***
LOL, Now substitute IRC and Discord with
Gopher/Gemini and Web.I hope you get the joke 😅***
james instead 🤣
james instead 🤣
$ inspect-db yarns.db | jq -r '.Value.URL' | grep 'aelaraji.com'
https://aelaraji.com/test_feed.txt
https://aelaraji.com/twtxt.txt
$ inspect-db yarns.db | jq -r '.Value.URL' | grep 'aelaraji.com'
https://aelaraji.com/test_feed.txt
https://aelaraji.com/twtxt.txt
kex1fhxntuc0av7q48hlfj970ve297dzzghn82wp5cahr9r92y8rlrqqtwp983
kex1fhxntuc0av7q48hlfj970ve297dzzghn82wp5cahr9r92y8rlrqqtwp983
- Drop
# url= from the spec.- We don't adopt
# uuid = -- Something @anth also mentioned (_see below_)We instead use the
@nick@domain to identify your feed in the first place and use that as the identify when calculating Twt hashes <id> + <timestamp> + <content>. Now in an ideal world I also agree, use WebFinger for this and expect that for the most part you'll be doing a WebFinger lookup of @user@domain to fetch someone's feed in the first place.The only problem with WebFinger is should this be mandated or a recommendation?
- Drop
# url= from the spec.- We don't adopt
# uuid = -- Something @anth also mentioned (_see below_)We instead use the
@nick@domain to identify your feed in the first place and use that as the identify when calculating Twt hashes <id> + <timestamp> + <content>. Now in an ideal world I also agree, use WebFinger for this and expect that for the most part you'll be doing a WebFinger lookup of @user@domain to fetch someone's feed in the first place.The only problem with WebFinger is should this be mandated or a recommendation?
> 17:42
I actually agree with in both counts and it got me thinking...
> 17:42
I actually agree with in both counts and it got me thinking...
Not sure what to say here. 🤔
Not sure what to say here. 🤔
Thank you to whomever said this! 🙇♂️
Thank you to whomever said this! 🙇♂️
See previous. Sorry 😞
See previous. Sorry 😞
See previous.
See previous.
Yes, I totally get where you're coming from. However after ~22 results, I _think_ y'all have figured out how to rank them appropriately anyway 🤣~
Yes, I totally get where you're coming from. However after ~22 results, I _think_ y'all have figured out how to rank them appropriately anyway 🤣~
> your poll should include questions about markdown. personally i think inline bits like style, links, images are yes. block quotes, code blocks, bullet lists are mid. but tables and footnotes are no.
Yes sorry about this, I wasn't able to change much after publishing the poll 😅
> your poll should include questions about markdown. personally i think inline bits like style, links, images are yes. block quotes, code blocks, bullet lists are mid. but tables and footnotes are no.
Yes sorry about this, I wasn't able to change much after publishing the poll 😅
Though I suppose it has to be the greater of the two. But I don't even have one euro to start with.
Though I suppose it has to be the greater of the two. But I don't even have one euro to start with.
yarnd hwoever:
$ yarnc debug https://sunshinegardens.org/~xjix/twtxt/tw.txt
...
bqor23a 2024-09-26T11:09:28-07:00 if twtxt 2 is dropping gemini support, i will probably move on and spend more time on my gemini social zine protocol instead. i think the direction of the protocol is probably fine, but for me web is a tier 2 publishing channel. if the choice is between gemini and http i'm always going to pick gemini. its been a fun ride, but i guess this is where i get off.
The
yarnc CLI tool and the lextwt parser we use in yarnd _correctly_ parses the feed and sets the Twter.HashingURI to the latest # url = found in the feed. However my pod hasn't picked this up 😢 I follow @cuaxolotl as https://sunshinegardens.org/~xjix/twtxt/tw.txt
yarnd hwoever:
$ yarnc debug https://sunshinegardens.org/~xjix/twtxt/tw.txt
...
bqor23a 2024-09-26T11:09:28-07:00 if twtxt 2 is dropping gemini support, i will probably move on and spend more time on my gemini social zine protocol instead. i think the direction of the protocol is probably fine, but for me web is a tier 2 publishing channel. if the choice is between gemini and http i'm always going to pick gemini. its been a fun ride, but i guess this is where i get off.
The
yarnc CLI tool and the lextwt parser we use in yarnd _correctly_ parses the feed and sets the Twter.HashingURI to the latest # url = found in the feed. However my pod hasn't picked this up 😢 I follow @cuaxolotl as https://sunshinegardens.org/~xjix/twtxt/tw.txt
yarnd hwoever:
$ yarnc debug https://sunshinegardens.org/~xjix/twtxt/tw.txt
...
bqor23a 2024-09-26T11:09:28-07:00\tif twtxt 2 is dropping gemini support, i will probably move on and spend more time on my gemini social zine protocol instead. i think the direction of the protocol is probably fine, but for me web is a tier 2 publishing channel. if the choice is between gemini and http i'm always going to pick gemini. its been a fun ride, but i guess this is where i get off.
The
yarnc CLI tool and the lextwt parser we use in yarnd _correctly_ parses the feed and sets the Twter.HashingURI to the latest # url = found in the feed. However my pod hasn't picked this up 😢 I follow @cuaxolotl as https://sunshinegardens.org/~xjix/twtxt/tw.txt
$ total=$(inspect-db yarns.db | jq -r '.Value.URL' | awk -F'//' '{if ($1 ~ /^https?/) print "http/https:"; else print $1}' | sort | uniq -c | awk '{sum+=$1} END {print sum}'); inspect-db yarns.db | jq -r '.Value.URL' | awk -F'//' '{if ($1 ~ /^https?/) print "http/https:"; else print $1}' | sort | uniq -c | awk -v total="$total" '{printf "%d %s %.2f%%\n", $1, $2, ($1/total)*100}' | sort -r
7 gemini: 0.66%
4 gopher: 0.38%
1046 http/https: 98.96%
$ total=$(inspect-db yarns.db | jq -r '.Value.URL' | awk -F'//' '{if ($1 ~ /^https?/) print "http/https:"; else print $1}' | sort | uniq -c | awk '{sum+=$1} END {print sum}'); inspect-db yarns.db | jq -r '.Value.URL' | awk -F'//' '{if ($1 ~ /^https?/) print "http/https:"; else print $1}' | sort | uniq -c | awk -v total="$total" '{printf "%d %s %.2f%%\\n", $1, $2, ($1/total)*100}' | sort -r
7 gemini: 0.66%
4 gopher: 0.38%
1046 http/https: 98.96%
$ total=$(inspect-db yarns.db | jq -r '.Value.URL' | awk -F'//' '{if ($1 ~ /^https?/) print "http/https:"; else print $1}' | sort | uniq -c | awk '{sum+=$1} END {print sum}'); inspect-db yarns.db | jq -r '.Value.URL' | awk -F'//' '{if ($1 ~ /^https?/) print "http/https:"; else print $1}' | sort | uniq -c | awk -v total="$total" '{printf "%d %s %.2f%%\\n", $1, $2, ($1/total)*100}' | sort -r
7 gemini: 0.66%
4 gopher: 0.38%
1046 http/https: 98.96%