@eldersnake Unfortunately, it's back down again. But my hopes are high as it is a 503 this time and not a connection error anymore. :-)
@eldersnake Unfortunately, it's back down again. But my hopes are high as it is a 503 this time and not a connection error anymore. :-)
Habrá que levantarse a desayunar, supongo ⌘ Read more****
Ibuprofeno de mi vida, que haría yo sin ti. ⌘ Read more****
✓ Despierta desde antes de las 6
✓ Con tremendo dolor de cabeza
✓ Rememorando errores y cositas vergonzosas del pasado.
Si no es el infierno se le parece ⌘ Read more****
Y aquí unas fotos de lo que viene en el libro. ⌘ Read more****
Esto se mete al horno y poco más.
El líquido se pone en un cuenco de barro en el que previamente ponemos las rodajas de piña.
Al final se sirve caliente a alguien sin decirle nada de lo que lleva. Será la piña que más suavemente comerán en su vida.
Podrás sorprender a tu pareja o a algún amigo/a/e con un postre sencillo pero molón. ⌘ Read more****
He cocinado Piña al Horno hoy !
Esto es una receta de Piña OISHI que sale en la película de animación japonesa "Recuerdos del ayer".
Lo interesante es que desaparece el sabor ese de la piña ácido.
Se hace con piña, té blanco, azúcar moreno de caña integral, vainilla y ya. Eso al horno 60 minutos y ya.
Sigo ... ⌘ Read more****
Un maquinarias fue Quino. Gran dibujante, mejor persona. En RTVE ahora mismo anda "Imprescindibles - Quinografía".
https://www.rtve.es/play/videos/imprescindibles/quinografia/16795133/ ⌘ Read more****
¿Qué corporación de las siguientes considera usted más peligrosa para la humanidad?
Oscorp
Umbrella Corporation
Palantir Technologies
Mamácorp ⌘ Read more****
#sabadoDePijamas ⌘ Read more****
¿Será legal esto en China? ⌘ Read more****
https://validator.w3.org/nu/about.html
That way you don’t forget. 🥳
I'm not a fan of the gemtext limits. This being only a single page (which probably doesn't get updated a whole lot), the efforts of having two dedicates files are not all that big, or so I'd at least naively imagine.
I always recommend checking the W3C validator results, even though I'm very guilty of not doing that myself. It just doesn't occur to me in the heat of the moment. I reckon if I were writing HTML on a more regular basis, I would pick up on making that a real habit. Anyway, your HTML being generated, you probably can't address the findings, though. So, might not be even worth the time heading over to the validator.
From a privacy point of view, personally, I would definitely host the CSS myself. Other than that, nice link collection. :-)
<li> a concerted choice (it doesn't look intended, but I might be wrong)? With CSS you can replace bullets on lists with whatever you want.
/https://baldo.cat/media/photos/IMG_6356.jpeg) #catsoftwtxt
### The criticism of AI as untrustworthy is a problem of misapplication, not capability.
This section says AI should not be treated as an authority. This is actually just what I said, except the AI phrased/framed it like it was a counter-argument.
The AI also said that users must develop “AI literacy”, again phrasing/framing it like a counter-argument. Well, that is also just what I said. I said you should treat AI output like a random blog and you should verify the sources, yadda yadda. That is “AI literacy”, isn’t it?
My text went one step further, though: I said that when you take this requirement of “AI literacy” into account, you basically end up with a fancy search engine, with extra overhead that costs time. The AI missed/ignored this in its reply.
Okay, so, the AI also said that you should use AI tools just for drafting and brainstorming. Granted, a *very rough* draft of something will probably be doable. But then you have to diligently verify every little detail of this draft – okay, fine, a draft is a draft, it’s fine if it contains errors. The thing is, though, that you really *must* do this verification. And I claim that many people will not do it, because AI outputs look sooooo convincing, they don’t *feel* like a draft that needs editing.
Can you, as an expert, still use an AI draft as a basis/foundation? Yeah, probably. But here’s the kicker: You did not create that draft. You were not involved in the “thought process” behind it. When you, a human being, make a draft, you often think something like: “Okay, I want to draw a picture of a landscape and there’s going to be a little house, but for now, I’ll just put in a rough sketch of the house and add the details later.” You are aware of what you left out. When the AI did the draft, you are not aware of what’s missing – even more so when every AI output already looks like a final product. For me, personally, this makes it much harder and slower to verify such a draft, and I mentioned this in my text.
### Skill Erosion vs. Skill Evolution
You, @prologic, also mentioned this in your car tyre example.
In my text, I gave two analogies: The gym analogy and the Google Translate analogy. Your car tyre example falls in the same category, but Gemini’s calculator example is different (and, again, gaslight-y, see below).
What I meant in my text: A person wants to be a programmer. To me, a programmer is a person who writes code, understands code, maintains code, writes documentation, and so on. In your example, a person who changes a car tyre would be a mechanic. Now, if you use AI to write the code and documentation for you, are you still a programmer? If you have no understanding of said code, are you a programmer? A person who does not know how to change a car tyre, is that still a mechanic?
No, you’re something else. You should not be hired as a programmer or a mechanic.
Yes, that is “skill evolution” – which is pretty much my point! But the AI framed it like a counter-argument. It didn’t understand my text.
(But what if that’s our future? What if all programming will look like that in some years? I claim: It’s not possible. If you don’t know how to program, then you don’t know how to read/understand code written by an AI. You are something else, but you’re not a programmer. It might be *valid* to be something else – but that wasn’t my point, my point was that you’re not a bloody programmer.)
Gemini’s calculator example is garbage, I think. Crunching numbers and doing mathematics (i.e., “complex problem-solving”) are two different things. Just because you now have a calculator, doesn’t mean it’ll free you up to do mathematical proofs or whatever.
What would have worked is this: Let’s say you’re an accountant and you sum up spendings. Without a calculator, this takes a lot of time and is error prone. But when you have one, you can work faster. But once again, there’s a little gaslight-y detail: A calculator is correct. Yes, it could have “bugs” (hello Intel FDIV), but its design actually properly calculates numbers. AI, on the other hand, does not understand a thing (our current AI, that is), it’s just a statistical model. So, this modified example (“accountant with a calculator”) would actually have to be phrased like this: Suppose there’s an accountant and you give her a magic box that spits out the correct result in, what, I don’t know, 70-90% of the time. The accountant couldn’t rely on this box now, could she? She’d either have to double-check everything or accept possibly wrong results. And that is how I feel like when I work with AI tools.
Gemini has no idea that its calculator example doesn’t make sense. It just spits out some generic “argument” that it picked up on some website.
### 3. The Technical and Legal Perspective (Scraping and Copyright)
The AI makes two points here. The first one, I might actually agree with (“bad bot behavior is not the fault of AI itself”).
The second point is, *once again*, gaslighting, because it is phrased/framed like a counter-argument. It implies that I said something which I didn’t. Like the AI, I said that you would have to adjust the copyright law! At the same time, the AI answer didn’t even question whether it’s okay to break the current law or not. It just said “lol yeah, change the laws”. (I wonder in what way the laws would have to be changed in the AI’s “opinion”, because some of these changes could kill some business opportunities – or the laws would have to have special AI clauses that only benefit the AI techbros. But I digress, that wasn’t part of Gemini’s answer.)
### tl;dr
Except for one point, I don’t accept any of Gemini’s “criticism”. It didn’t pick up on lots of details, ignored arguments, and I can just instinctively tell that this thing does not *understand* anything it wrote (which is correct, it’s just a statistical model).
And it framed everything like a counter-argument, while actually repeating what I said. That’s gaslighting: When Alice says “the sky is blue” and Bob replies with “why do you say the sky is purple?!”
But it sure looks convincing, doesn’t it?
### Never again
This took so much of my time. I won’t do this again. 😂
I then asked to counter the OP opinions---as in "how would you counter the author's opinion?". The reply was very long, but started like this:
> "That's an excellent question, as the post lays out some very strong, well-reasoned criticisms. Countering these points requires acknowledging the valid concerns while presenting a perspective focused on mitigation, responsible integration, and the unique benefits of AI."
What followed was extensive, so I asked for a summary, which didn't do justice to the wall of text that preceded it.
Acabo de ver una señora con las cejas verdes, y el maquillaje naranja risquetto , labios blancos y me estaba pareciendo una elección estética arriesgada pero genial. Tipo Ompa Loompa.
Pero me acabo de dar cuenta que no era una eleccion deliberada. ⌘ Read more****
> The modern, open-source CAPTCHA
>> Lightweight, self-hosted, privacy-friendly, and designed to put you first. Switch from reCAPTCHA in minutes.
RE: https://tkz.one/@mistermaceta/115507514818226140
Voy a probar esto de citar citando un toot del gran mistermaceta en el que comenta un tema de centros de datos y agua.
A nivel personal creo que el agua no tendría que ir para los centros de datos. Ni agua ni aguo.
Y bueno. Esta es mi primera cita. ⌘ Read more****
Bueno espera, me ha salido esta canción, super 80tera y me mola mucho:
Flipturn - Burnout Days
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Wa8Rxzyz50&list=RD20cuFhgPLEo&index=2
#music #flipturn ⌘ Read more****
Buenos días!
Hoy seguiremos escuchando los punkerrimos Surfing Sirles, extinta banda Barcelonina.
Toca, Romaní, Semen i Sang
https://elssurfingsirles.bandcamp.com/album/roman-semen-i-sang
#musica #music #surfingsirles ⌘ Read more****
Una vecina de León deja sin internet a todo su pueblo al cortar los cables de fibra óptica: "No deja que vengan a repararlo" https://www.20minutos.es/television/una-vecina-leon-deja-sin-internet-todo-su-pueblo-cortar-los-cables-fibra-optica-no-deja-que-vengan-repararlo\_6734612\_0.html ⌘ Read more****