#running #treadmill
#running #treadmill
#running #treadmill
I'm also working on my rewrite at the moment, but that started… *looking at the git history*… oh wow! O_o Over two years ago! I just implemented jumping to the next/previous unread message.
description = 🏗 Full-Stack developer (Mainly Python) ✍ Writer[...]
https://github.com/tanrax/thankful-eyes-theme.el
Enjoy!
#emacs #accessibility
https://github.com/tanrax/thankful-eyes-theme.el
Enjoy!
#emacs #accessibility
@javivf @lafe @melyanna @nff @shreyan
You may also want to renovate an old abandoned manor!?
- System Design Interview Vol. 1 and 2, Alex Xu and Sahn Lam
- Designing Data-Intensive Applications, Martin Kleppmann
https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/information-about-the-new-terms-of-use-and-updated-privacy/m-p/87922/highlight/true#M33705
TLDR? It's bull. Let's dive in?
They focus basically in saying three things:
1) Mozilla needs a license to your data to do things like sending your words to a search engine;
2) there's #AI stuff that needs ToS and Priv. Policy;
3) the acceptable use policy was already in place at Mozilla for the website, etc..
Why bull?
1) if what I type on Firefox (the browser) was sent to Mozilla so they could send it to the search engine, then they'd need access to it. It's not how a browser works or how a privacy-caring browser should ever work. Since what goes on between my Firefox textfields and the browsers I submit to is between us and then, Mozilla should have nothing to do with that data, with or without license.
2) They talk about two kinds of AI: AI services you can access to from Firefox, and AI offline and private abilities within Firefox. For the first, each of those services - if we choose to use them - can and should have their own ToS (distinct from Firefox or any other software used to reach them). AI services running locally should never share anything with anyone, so there's no licenses Mozilla should get.
3) Keep your website's ToS to your website, I don't need it on Firefox - and Mozilla neither.
https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/information-about-the-new-terms-of-use-and-updated-privacy/m-p/87922/highlight/true#M33705
TLDR? It's bull. Let's dive in?
They focus basically in saying three things:
1) Mozilla needs a license to your data to do things like sending your words to a search engine;
2) there's #AI stuff that needs ToS and Priv. Policy;
3) the acceptable use policy was already in place at Mozilla for the website, etc..
Why bull?
1) if what I type on Firefox (the browser) was sent to Mozilla so they could send it to the search engine, then they'd need access to it. It's not how a browser works or how a privacy-caring browser should ever work. Since what goes on between my Firefox textfields and the browsers I submit to is between us and then, Mozilla should have nothing to do with that data, with or without license.
2) They talk about two kinds of AI: AI services you can access to from Firefox, and AI offline and private abilities within Firefox. For the first, each of those services - if we choose to use them - can and should have their own ToS (distinct from Firefox or any other software used to reach them). AI services running locally should never share anything with anyone, so there's no licenses Mozilla should get.
3) Keep your website's ToS to your website, I don't need it on Firefox - and Mozilla neither.
.txt file:description = ðŸ—Perhaps your nginx server is missing a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 header?https://serverfault.com/a/975289
In
timeline it looks OK however, I think it's relying on> The file must be encoded with UTF-8
of the original spec:
https://twtxt.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user/twtxtfile.html
http(s)://domain.tls is not a valid resource, but http(s)://domain.tls/ is, as you can see here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/2581423I suppose that internally the wget/curl or whatever client you are using is redirecting it?
Feed was redirected: https://twtxt.andros.dev -> https://twtxt.andros.dev/
Each time my client fetches your feed. It just doesn't make any sense to me. Wouldn't be both, pretty much, be the same (I noticed the
/, yes)?
Feed was redirected: https://twtxt.andros.dev -> https://twtxt.andros.dev/
Each time my client fetches your feed. It just doesn't make any sense to me. Wouldn't be both, pretty much, be the same (I noticed the
/, yes)?
brew applications. Want to keep it lean!
brew applications. Want to keep it lean!
DVAR - Bedrii Wedrii
https://dvar.bandcamp.com/track/bedrii-wedrii
foto do CD "fayah!" dos DVAR, de onde veio a música escolhida esta semana
DVAR - Bedrii Wedrii
https://dvar.bandcamp.com/track/bedrii-wedrii
foto do CD "fayah!" dos DVAR, de onde veio a música escolhida esta semana
https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/information-about-the-new-terms-of-use-and-updated-privacy/m-p/87735
There they tell users that "You stay in control". Unfortunately, their new Terms of Use say that:
"Every once in a while, Mozilla may decide to update these Terms. We will post the updated Terms online. We will take your continued use of Firefox as acceptance of such changes."
No matter how common this has become over the past years, this is quite unacceptable, and Firefox users deserve better from Mozilla. The fact that they can unilaterally change the terms and users are automatically bound to them (as soon as they use the browser again - even if they're using it to open the document where they can see the date on the terms!) is not a fair agreement - and works against the claim that "You stay in control".
https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/information-about-the-new-terms-of-use-and-updated-privacy/m-p/87735
There they tell users that "You stay in control". Unfortunately, their new Terms of Use say that:
"Every once in a while, Mozilla may decide to update these Terms. We will post the updated Terms online. We will take your continued use of Firefox as acceptance of such changes."
No matter how common this has become over the past years, this is quite unacceptable, and Firefox users deserve better from Mozilla. The fact that they can unilaterally change the terms and users are automatically bound to them (as soon as they use the browser again - even if they're using it to open the document where they can see the date on the terms!) is not a fair agreement - and works against the claim that "You stay in control".
"We need a license to allow us to make some of the basic functionality of Firefox possible. Without it, we couldn’t use information typed into Firefox, for example."
In the explanation, they don't tell us -what- is that "some basic functionality" they refer to, or why would Mozilla need to use information typed into Firefox, for example.
"We need a license to allow us to make some of the basic functionality of Firefox possible. Without it, we couldn’t use information typed into Firefox, for example."
In the explanation, they don't tell us -what- is that "some basic functionality" they refer to, or why would Mozilla need to use information typed into Firefox, for example.
But of course, everyone is welcome to take a look at https://github.com/upputter/TwtxtReaderMK1
> To me it appeared that the failed attempts to ban NPD in the past actually helped them gain more supporters.
What makes AfD stronger *for sure* is just going “lol nah we’re not even going to try”:
https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/innenpolitik/afd-verbot-antrag-100.html
If they don’t try, then it means that “it can’t be that bad, it’s just a normal party”, right? 😡