2022-10-01T05:49:32Z\t(#f6yb3ma) second tentative (posted from twx through yarnsocial posthook plugin)
2022-10-01T05:53:15Z\t(#f6yb3ma) Some adjustement needed but it works well (posted from twx through yarnsocial posthook plugin)
2022-10-01T05:56:46Z\t(#f6yb3ma) I can go to bed happy, good night everybody
But yarn social doesn't add it to his /conv database so I don't see it as a reply nor as a Thread like : https://twtxt.net/conv/f6yb3ma
2022-10-01T05:49:32Z (#f6yb3ma) second tentative (posted from twx through yarnsocial posthook plugin)
2022-10-01T05:53:15Z (#f6yb3ma) Some adjustement needed but it works well (posted from twx through yarnsocial posthook plugin)
2022-10-01T05:56:46Z (#f6yb3ma) I can go to bed happy, good night everybody
But yarn social doesn't add it to his /conv database so I don't see it as a reply nor as a Thread like : https://twtxt.net/conv/f6yb3ma
distributed vs decentralized
The new version using heavily go routines takes around 10 seconds.
1 - even a switch case would be better
2 - done quickly
3 - done quickly
4- yes BUT if I check only mentions I will loose the header following one, (that are not always in the same style: cf : https://niplav.github.io/twtxt.txt ), I can do both and only loose the redirection BUT I need to be bored again to do that change (1 hour I ll say)
5 - (easy) when i will be bored again it will be on the pipe.
Thanks
1. even a switch case would be better
2. done quickly
3. done quickly
4. yes BUT if I check only mentions I will loose the header following one, (that are not always in the same style: cf : https://niplav.github.io/twtxt.txt ), I can do both and only loose the redirection BUT I need to be bored again to do that change (1 hour I ll say)
5. (easy) when i will be bored again it will be on the pipe.
Thanks
- I adjusted the code to take for the rank, taking in account only the mentions and not weighted by the number of tweets)
- the files generated will be in your home folder
- What are you talking about, you use firefox on Linux in a village of maximum 1000 person, you don't even need to use cookies.
:D
- What are you talking about, you use firefox on Linux in a village of maximum 1000 people, you don't even need to use cookies.
:D
- What are you talking about, you use firefox on Linux in a village of maximum 1000 person, you don't even need use cookies.
:D
- What are you talking about, you use firefox on Linux in a village of maximum 1000 people, you don't even need to use cookies.
:D
- Latest tweet : Discovery tab has it (https://twtxt.net/discover)
- Search for tweets : that one is missing
- Mentions : Mentions tab has it (https://twtxt.net/mentions)
- Tag : the search tag bar is there (https://twtxt.net/search?tag=mytag)
- User : you can see a profile (https://twtxt.net/user/brasshopper/)
- Some don't answer anymore, the one that does answer => accessible (721)
- Some still post in 2022 => active (111)
Then I computed a normalized ranking algorithm in all of those with the number of time a people talk about you for the influence (it sounds like I'm talking like a star trek characters).
- I found 1289 twtxt account
- among those 721 are accessible ( 712 http / 9 gemini / 0 gopher)
- but only 111 account are still active in 2022 :S (107 http / 4 gemini / 0 gopher).
results here
- I found 1289 twtxt account
- among those 721 are accessible ( 712 http/ 9 gemini / 0 gopher)
- but only 111 account are still active in 2022 :S (107 http / 4 gemini / 0 gopher).
results here
- I found 1289 twtxt account
- among those 721 are accessible ( 712 http / 9 gemini / 0 gopher)
- but only 111 account are still active in 2022 :S (107 http / 4 gemini / 0 gopher).
I have also rank all the accounts by influence. (just for fun) without surprise @prologic is the 1st most influential twtxter, @lyse you are 3rd, (I'm 32nd)
results here
- I found 1289 twtxt account
- among those 721 are accessible ( 712 http / 9 gemini / 0 gopher)
- but only 111 account are still active in 2022 :S (107 http / 4 gemini / 0 gopher).
I have also rank all the accounts by influence. (just for fun) without surprise @prologic is the most influential twtxter
results here
- I found 1289 twtxt account
- among those 721 are accessible ( 712 http / 9 gemini / 0 gopher)
- but only 111 account are still active in 2022 :S (107 http / 4 gemini / 0 gopher).
I have also rank all the accounts by influence. (just for fun) without surprise @prologic is the 1st most influential twtxter (I'm 32nd)
results here
- I found 1289 twtxt account
- among those 721 are accessible ( 712 http / 9 gemini / 0 gopher)
- but only 111 account are still active in 2022 :S (107 http / 4 gemini / 0 gopher).
I have also rank all the accounts by influence. (just for fun without surprise @prologic is the most influential twtxter)
results here
{{yarn}}) that will do behind the scene like yarnc login + yarnc tweet. so the twtxt local will only be a backup.On the second step I will imlement the same PsotHook solution for follow and unfollow.
twx tweet -r hash <text>, the fork not yet.
twx tweet -r hash <text>, the fork not yet.
But you gave me a good idea to implement in mine, something to show the last replies to my tweets, or mentions of my name. Thanks
It should have the basic for a client (follow/unfollow/tweet/timeline), the fancy part will soon come (to see on the readme file).
It should have the basic for a client, the fancy part will soon come (to see on the readme file).
GO111MODULE=off go get -u github.com/jdtron/twet
BUT Apple has a better integration with others apps and with my phone.
git --no-pager log --all --reverse --date=format:'%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ' --format=format:'%cd (#%h) %s' > twtxt.txt
git --no-pager log --all --reverse --date=format:'%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ' --format=format:'%cd (#%h) %s' > twtxt.txt
prologic #oriex7q (57m ago)
(#b3xm5ua) @tkanos(tkanos) Yeah I was wondering that myself too.
as you see you post has 2 hash : the one in your message : #b3xm5ua, and the one generated on the fly #oriex7q.
So if I try to reply to #b3xm5ua, I will receive a message like :
Twt hash #b3xm5ua is not in your timeline. Proceed? (y/N):
Encouraging me to use the wrong one oriex7q.
prologic #oriex7q (57m ago)
(#b3xm5ua) @tkanos(tkanos) Yeah I was wondering that myself too.
as you see you post has 2 hash : the one in your message : #b3xm5ua, and the one generated on the fly #oriex7q.
So if I try to reply to #b3xm5ua, I will receive a message like :
Twt hash #b3xm5ua is not in your timeline. Proceed? (y/N):
Encouraging me to use the wrong one oriex7q.
prologic #oriex7q (57m ago)
(#b3xm5ua) @tkanos(tkanos) Yeah I was wondering that myself too.
as you see you post has 2 hash : the one in your message : #b3xm5ua, and the one generated on the fly #oriex7q.
So if I try to reply to #b3xm5ua, I will receive a message like :
Twt hash #b3xm5ua is not in your timeline. Proceed? (y/N):
Encouraging me to use the wrong one oriex7q.
git log --all --reverse --date=format:'%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ' --format=format:'%cd (#%h) %s'
"Use a twtxt Yarn-compatible client that at least implements the Twt Subject Ext and Twt Hash Ext such as: ..."
git log --all --reverse --date=format:'%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ' --format=format:'%cd %h %s' | awk -F ' ' '{ if($3 == "HEAD" || $3 == "master") {printf $1 " (#" $2 ") ";} else printf $1 " " $3 " "; {for (i=4; i<NF; i++) printf $i " ";print $NF}}' > twtxt.txt