Other than access to the data behind it, Microsoft has nothing special that allows it to create something like CoPilot. The technology behind it has been around for at least a decade. There could be a "public" version of this same tool made by a cooperating group of people volunteering, "leasing", or selling their source code into it. There could likewise be an ethically-created corporate version. Such a thing would give individual developers or organizations the choice to include their code in the tool, possibly for a fee if that's something they want or require. The creators of the tool would have to acknowledge that they have suppliers--the people who create the code that makes their tool possible--instead of simply stealing what they need and pretending that's fine.
This era we're living through, with large companies stomping over all laws and regulations, blatantly stealing other people's work for their own profit, cannot come to an end soon enough. It is destroying innovation, and we all suffer for that. Having one nifty tool like CoPilot that gives a bit of convenience is nowhere near worth the tremendous loss that Microsoft's actions in this instace are creating for everyone.
But hey, at least that Traefik update today went smoothly. So there’s that.
But hey, at least that Traefik update today went smoothly. So there’s that.
But hey, at least that Traefik update today went smoothly. So there’s that.
In short, it's a gigantic resource-grab. They're greedy assholes taking advantage of the hard work of millions of people without giving a single cent back to any of them. I hope they're sued so often that this product is destroyed.
I would be happy if there would be a delta button beside every entry just like you have the reply and fork. maybe it can be put on the right side next to bookmark and mute?
#running
#running
#running
was running out of time so did a quick two miler. felt pretty good even though apparently my HR was up a bit.
#running
#cycling
#cycling
#cycling
#cycling
# type = ... and # exts = ...? 🤔
# type = ... and # exts = ...? 🤔
# type = ... and # exts = ...? 🤔
Let's not solve for any ideal purism hete but for real problems that have positive outcomes to clients and users of those clients 👌
Let's not solve for any ideal purism hete but for real problems that have positive outcomes to clients and users of those clients 👌
Let's not solve for any ideal purism hete but for real problems that have positive outcomes to clients and users of those clients 👌
⨁ Follow button on their profile page or use the Follow form and enter a Twtxt URL. You may also find other feeds of interest via Feeds. Welcome! 🤗
⨁ Follow button on their profile page or use the Follow form and enter a Twtxt URL. You may also find other feeds of interest via Feeds. Welcome! 🤗
Particle board with fucked up rebbet
# doctype = whatever? Also, which problem does this solve? What would clients do differently? And humans just could look at the comment or URL and see that this feed makes use of extensions – if they care. Twtxt purists would certainly hate such a new thing, too, I don't think it helps them in any way. So I don't see the use case for that. Can you please elaborate, @darch, what you had in mind?My feed's preamble starts with (links to be debatable):
# Learn more about twtxt at: https://github.com/buckket/twtxt
# This feed makes use of some extensions: https://dev.twtxt.net/
#running
#running
#running