# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 196325
# self = https://watcher.sour.is?offset=144325
# next = https://watcher.sour.is?offset=144425
# prev = https://watcher.sour.is?offset=144225
@lyse jot is usually a BSD tool, hence hardly known. It’s similar to seq on GNU.
@lyse jot is usually a BSD tool, hence hardly known. It’s similar to seq on GNU.
@lyse jot is usually a BSD tool, hence hardly known. It’s similar to seq on GNU.
[47°09′47″S, 126°43′53″W] --white noise--
❤️ 🎶: Ako Ba O Siya? by Katrina Velarde
❤️ 🎶: Ako Ba O Siya? by Katrina Velarde
<SP> image test no.2 #html 
https://darch.dk/twtxt/2022-01-25_screenshot-2022-01-21-at-15.33.45.png">=
<SP> image test no.2 #html https://darch.dk/twtxt/2022-01-25_screenshot-2022-01-21-at-15.33.45.png">=
<SP> image test #markdown 
<SP> image test #markdown
<Anonymus> no name or link
<Anonymus> no name or link
[47°09′42″S, 126°43′39″W] Reading: 1.11 Sv
@chunkimo I'm not sure about the addiction to be honest 🤔
@chunkimo I'm not sure about the addiction to be honest 🤔
@chunkimo I'm not sure about the addiction to be honest 🤔
The Lightning lost, but at least the Avalanche and Bruins lost, too. I'm going to have to root for the Florida Panthers now.
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:2 TWTS:590 ARCHIVED:63977 CACHE:2176 FOLLOWERS:13 FOLLOWING:14
@abucci Yeah, and it looks like (correct me if I'm wrong) his discussions women, sophisticated women and comparisons to property crimes is quite recent. As a clinical psychologist (which is is) I can understand and pick apart what he's saying from a psychological point of view, the problem is its rather provoking and I don't quite agree with it. I think it's easy to take Jordan Peterson out of context here, and maybe we are? -- I feel like he should have chosen his words a bit better here. I'm quite confident that if you asked him directly "do you support rape", or "is rape ok" he would flat out say no. I'm a bit on the fence on this one just because of his background and how complex language can be to convey.
@abucci Yeah, and it looks like (correct me if I'm wrong) his discussions women, sophisticated women and comparisons to property crimes is quite recent. As a clinical psychologist (which is is) I can understand and pick apart what he's saying from a psychological point of view, the problem is its rather provoking and I don't quite agree with it. I think it's easy to take Jordan Peterson out of context here, and maybe we are? -- I feel like he should have chosen his words a bit better here. I'm quite confident that if you asked him directly "do you support rape", or "is rape ok" he would flat out say no. I'm a bit on the fence on this one just because of his background and how complex language can be to convey.
@abucci Yeah, and it looks like (correct me if I'm wrong) his discussions women, sophisticated women and comparisons to property crimes is quite recent. As a clinical psychologist (which is is) I can understand and pick apart what he's saying from a psychological point of view, the problem is its rather provoking and I don't quite agree with it. I think it's easy to take Jordan Peterson out of context here, and maybe we are? -- I feel like he should have chosen his words a bit better here. I'm quite confident that if you asked him directly "do you support rape", or "is rape ok" he would flat out say no. I'm a bit on the fence on this one just because of his background and how complex language can be to convey.
@chunkimo By all means! 🙏 What I meant by "boring" is we (as a community) aren't really interested in emulating anything like Twitter/Mastodon/etc A lot of the principles of what we've built are laid out in [About Yarn.social[(https://yarn.social/about.html)
@chunkimo By all means! 🙏 What I meant by "boring" is we (as a community) aren't really interested in emulating anything like Twitter/Mastodon/etc A lot of the principles of what we've built are laid out in [About Yarn.social[(https://yarn.social/about.html)
@chunkimo By all means! 🙏 What I meant by "boring" is we (as a community) aren't really interested in emulating anything like Twitter/Mastodon/etc A lot of the principles of what we've built are laid out in [About Yarn.social[(https://yarn.social/about.html)
@xuu Hmmm that's a pretty stupid argument to make 😱 Who da fuq would you sell your homes or even whole islands to that are now under water?! 🤦♂️
@xuu Hmmm that's a pretty stupid argument to make 😱 Who da fuq would you sell your homes or even whole islands to that are now under water?! 🤦♂️
@xuu Hmmm that's a pretty stupid argument to make 😱 Who da fuq would you sell your homes or even whole islands to that are now under water?! 🤦♂️
How long is *your* fundamental OODA loop?
How long is *your* fundamental OODA loop?
How long is *your* fundamental OODA loop?
How long is *your* fundamental OODA loop?
How long is *your* fundamental OODA loop?
How long is *your* fundamental OODA loop?
I don't remember where I first read this, but: A government's OODA loop is ~6 months long.~
I don't remember where I first read this, but: A government's OODA loop is ~6 months long.~
I don't remember where I first read this, but: A government's OODA loop is ~6 months long.~
I don't remember where I first read this, but: A government's OODA loop is ~6 months long.~
I don't remember where I first read this, but: A government's OODA loop is ~6 months long.~
I don't remember where I first read this, but: A government's OODA loop is ~6 months long.~
@movq Thank you! Yeah, I'm quite lucky with nature indeed. Although, there can be quite some people around, too. Especially if the weather is cooperating. But it helps that I don't mind getting a bit dirty, so I can take smaller, less frequently travelled paths. :-) If I move one day, I will only relocate to rural areas with very few people (much less than here) and lots of nature, like Schwarzwald, Schwäbische Alb, Allgäu etc. The ever-growing population just sucks.
Today we watched The X Files again, after a break for some months.
@prx I never heard of jot before. Often I simply use pwgen -sy 64.
[47°09′09″S, 126°43′48″W] 3668 days without news from Herve
Here I am, looking at my bookshelf, where the '12 rules for life' book sits.
I found the way he had to be put in a coma to get off addiction to his medicine etc fascinating. It felt like the good old 'do as I say, not as I do' type of thing. But hey - regardless of who you are or how strong you portray yourself - there can always be hard issues to tackle in life.
I may have misspoken in my haste/anguish. I don't know of any examples of Ben Shapiro advocating rape. I do know them of Jordan Peterson. He's known for that, but I've seen it myself. So, to be clear, I don't know if Ben Shapiro is a rape apologist and have no evidence of that. Wouldn't surprise me frankly because the set of ideas he does talk about tends to include being A-OK with crimes against women, but anyway.
@prologic When you unpack what he's saying in that video (which I've watched, and just now re-watched), and strip away all his attempts to wrap this idea in fancy-sound language, he is saying: it would be better if women were viewed as property of men, because then if they were raped, the men who owned them would get mad and do something about it. Because rape would be a property crime then, like trespassing or theft. Left unspoken by him, but very much known to him, is that the man/men who "own" a woman can then have their way with her, just like they can freely walk around their yard or use their own stuff. In his envisioned better world, it'd be impossible for a husband to rape his wife, for instance, because she is his property and he can do almost anything he wants (that's literally what "property" is in Western countries).
It's so fucked up it's hard to put into words how fucked up it is. And this isn't the only bad idea who bangs on about!
[47°09′32″S, 126°43′04″W] Transponder fixed
@chunkimo Oh hahaha, sadly there are no addictive algoriss at play here, nothing being shoved in your face, no ads, no tracking, blah blah blah. Pretty boring fully decentralised pure microBlogging at its best with enough "modern" feature you kind of expect 👌
@chunkimo Oh hahaha, sadly there are no addictive algoriss at play here, nothing being shoved in your face, no ads, no tracking, blah blah blah. Pretty boring fully decentralised pure microBlogging at its best with enough "modern" feature you kind of expect 👌
@chunkimo Oh hahaha, sadly there are no addictive algoriss at play here, nothing being shoved in your face, no ads, no tracking, blah blah blah. Pretty boring fully decentralised pure microBlogging at its best with enough "modern" feature you kind of expect 👌
For example, he talks about "shophistied women" and how "having prior positive relationships" with other men (fathers, brothers) are more likely to express their strong "no" stange to pushy men. He might be talking purely from a psychological standpoint at this point, but geez, he really should have just said outright from the start "rape is wrong" (or something) and been a bit more careful with his words.
I also don't need "men" to tell me that rape is wrong ffs 🤦♂️
For example, he talks about "shophistied women" and how "having prior positive relationships" with other men (fathers, brothers) are more likely to express their strong "no" stange to pushy men. He might be talking purely from a psychological standpoint at this point, but geez, he really should have just said outright from the start "rape is wrong" (or something) and been a bit more careful with his words.
I also don't need "men" to tell me that rape is wrong ffs 🤦♂️
For example, he talks about "shophistied women" and how "having prior positive relationships" with other men (fathers, brothers) are more likely to express their strong "no" stange to pushy men. He might be talking purely from a psychological standpoint at this point, but geez, he really should have just said outright from the start "rape is wrong" (or something) and been a bit more careful with his words.
I also don't need "men" to tell me that rape is wrong ffs 🤦♂️
@abucci Okay, your point on strange (borderline dangerous) ideas on "rape" are spot on. I found this video and comentrary (sadly which was more annoying than helpful). As someone with much experience with sexual abuse, etc, I find his views on this to be umm how shall I put this. Suptid?
@abucci Okay, your point on strange (borderline dangerous) ideas on "rape" are spot on. I found this video and comentrary (sadly which was more annoying than helpful). As someone with much experience with sexual abuse, etc, I find his views on this to be umm how shall I put this. Suptid?
@abucci Okay, your point on strange (borderline dangerous) ideas on "rape" are spot on. I found this video and comentrary (sadly which was more annoying than helpful). As someone with much experience with sexual abuse, etc, I find his views on this to be umm how shall I put this. Suptid?
@movq Here, "vaccination" status was never asked for, noe once. Had to do all the "paperwork" and such, but yeah it just all fell apart pretty damn quickly.
@movq Here, "vaccination" status was never asked for, noe once. Had to do all the "paperwork" and such, but yeah it just all fell apart pretty damn quickly.
@movq Here, "vaccination" status was never asked for, noe once. Had to do all the "paperwork" and such, but yeah it just all fell apart pretty damn quickly.
@chunkimo Well welcome 🤗 -- And sorry about the debate/discussion I'm having some other folks on some "internet characters" I've recently come across. I may be misinformed, but I'll have to do my research to be sure. Anyway welcome 🤗
@chunkimo Well welcome 🤗 -- And sorry about the debate/discussion I'm having some other folks on some "internet characters" I've recently come across. I may be misinformed, but I'll have to do my research to be sure. Anyway welcome 🤗
@chunkimo Well welcome 🤗 -- And sorry about the debate/discussion I'm having some other folks on some "internet characters" I've recently come across. I may be misinformed, but I'll have to do my research to be sure. Anyway welcome 🤗
I just want one clear example, just one, where either of these two (ghouls as you put it) said anything about or anything in support of rape. Obviously I don't think Rape is OK, any sensible person would never think that rape is ok. I don't.
I just want one clear example, just one, where either of these two (ghouls as you put it) said anything about or anything in support of rape. Obviously I don't think Rape is OK, any sensible person would never think that rape is ok. I don't.
I just want one clear example, just one, where either of these two (ghouls as you put it) said anything about or anything in support of rape. Obviously I don't think Rape is OK, any sensible person would never think that rape is ok. I don't.
@prologic Maybe so, but that's not because of the people who are objecting to Jordan Peterson, that's for sure. You really need to read the articles I've posted before going there. Really.
@abucci I'm not defending btw. I'm merely asking questions. I clearly don't have the experiences and background you seem to have on these individuals.
@abucci I'm not defending btw. I'm merely asking questions. I clearly don't have the experiences and background you seem to have on these individuals.
@abucci I'm not defending btw. I'm merely asking questions. I clearly don't have the experiences and background you seem to have on these individuals.
@prologic It went there because you are supporting bad people who themselves operate at the level of outrage. You cannot have a "debate" about the ideas of someone like Peterson or Shapiro, *because those ideas should not be considered debate-worthy*. Rape is not OK, period, the end. It is not up for debate or discussion. Yet Peterson acts as if it is. That is abhorrent, and unacceptable in 2023.
@prologic Because they are rightwing assholes with a huge platform and they are literally *HURTING PEOPLE*. People get attacked because of things people like Shapiro and Peterson say. This is not just idle chitchat over coffee. They are saying things like it's OK to rape women (and NO I am not going to dig out the videos where they say that --that's up to YOU to do, do your own homework before defending these ghouls).
@abucci Thanks I'll look into this. But you've forgive me if I don't just take your word for it. I've only just come across him recently, so I'll do my research.
@abucci Thanks I'll look into this. But you've forgive me if I don't just take your word for it. I've only just come across him recently, so I'll do my research.
@abucci Thanks I'll look into this. But you've forgive me if I don't just take your word for it. I've only just come across him recently, so I'll do my research.
@prologic
> Taking Jordan Peterson asn an example, the only thing he “preaches” (if you want to call it that) is to be honest with yourself and to take responsibility.
This is simply untrue. Read the articles I posted, seriously.
In a tweet in one of the articles I posted, Peterson states there is no white supremacy in Canada. This is blatantly false. It is disinformation. Peterson has made statements that rape is OK (he uses "fancy" language like "women should be naturally converted into mothers" but unpack that a bit--what he means is legalized rape followed by forced conception). He is openly anti-LGBTQ and refuses to use peoples' preferred pronouns. He seems to believe that women who wear makeup at work are asking to be sexually harassed.
He's using his platform in academia to pretend that straight, white men are somehow the most aggrieved group in the world and everyone else is just whining and can get fucked. The patron saint of Men's Rights Activists and incels. I find him odious.
@abucci Sorry not inclined to do what?
And yeah I will read those articles (bookmarked your Twt), but not at 1am 🤣