# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 196320
# self = https://watcher.sour.is?offset=153525
# next = https://watcher.sour.is?offset=153625
# prev = https://watcher.sour.is?offset=153425
@shreyan the whole thing is just super weird 🤯
[47°09′41″S, 126°43′55″W] Working impossible due to blizzard
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:2 TWTS:793 ARCHIVED:67940 CACHE:2351 FOLLOWERS:14 FOLLOWING:14
Looking forward to tomorrow's U.S. holiday.
[47°09′42″S, 126°43′26″W] Wind speed: 105kph
[47°09′51″S, 126°43′09″W] Automatic systems disengaged due to heavy rain
@movq It feels like the wrong solution to a very wrong problem right?! 🤣
@movq It feels like the wrong solution to a very wrong problem right?! 🤣
@movq It feels like the wrong solution to a very wrong problem right?! 🤣
Firefox’s new option to automatically block/accept cookie banners feels super useful. 😍 At _very, *very*_ wrong. We shouldn’t need this. Oh dear.
Firefox’s new option to automatically block/accept cookie banners feels super useful. 😍 At _very, *very*_ wrong. We shouldn’t need this. Oh dear.
Firefox’s new option to automatically block/accept cookie banners feels super useful. 😍 At _very, *very*_ wrong. We shouldn’t need this. Oh dear.
Thats the reason of fellowship.
A 0 is important in companian with other 0, if they follow a 1.
[47°09′04″S, 126°43′06″W] Weather forecast alert -- storm from N
[47°09′38″S, 126°43′55″W] --white noise--
@slashdot Didn't we see this story already? 🤔
@slashdot Didn't we see this story already? 🤔
@slashdot Didn't we see this story already? 🤔
@xuu Yeah innovation is kind of dead when you have to compete with the big tech Gia at 🤯😢 Even when you're trying not to compete with them (FANG) 🤦♂️
@xuu Yeah innovation is kind of dead when you have to compete with the big tech Gia at 🤯😢 Even when you're trying not to compete with them (FANG) 🤦♂️
@xuu Yeah innovation is kind of dead when you have to compete with the big tech Gia at 🤯😢 Even when you're trying not to compete with them (FANG) 🤦♂️
I worry about spam for you 🤗
I worry about spam for you 🤗
I worry about spam for you 🤗
[47°09′59″S, 126°43′39″W] Reading: 0.24 Sv
@prologic its not.. There are going to be 1000s of copy cat apps built on AI. And they will all die out when the companies that have the AI platforms copy them. It happened all the time with windows and mac os. And iphone.. Like flashlight and sound recorder apps.
@prologic its not.. There are going to be 1000s of copy cat apps built on AI. And they will all die out when the companies that have the AI platforms copy them. It happened all the time with windows and mac os. And iphone.. Like flashlight and sound recorder apps.
@eapl.me What does that "reply via Email" button do? 🤔
@eapl.me What does that "reply via Email" button do? 🤔
@eapl.me What does that "reply via Email" button do? 🤔
@xuu I see I see 🤔 So who came up with the idea first then? 🤔 It doesn't sound particularly novel nor unique 😆
@xuu I see I see 🤔 So who came up with the idea first then? 🤔 It doesn't sound particularly novel nor unique 😆
@xuu I see I see 🤔 So who came up with the idea first then? 🤔 It doesn't sound particularly novel nor unique 😆
EN: once a friend told me that
PT: um amigo da onça disse-me que
EN: once a friend told me that
PT: um amigo da onça disse-me que
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:2 TWTS:792 ARCHIVED:67928 CACHE:2341 FOLLOWERS:14 FOLLOWING:14
@movq Apparently it's not necessarily targeted at Firefox per se, as the delayed loading thing has happened on Chromium-based browsers too, but more YouTube targeting those running an adblocker. The only part about that I don't quite get is why just spoofing a Chrome user agent often fixes it.
@movq I guess so. It's weird and obsessive. They are compulsively monopolistic anymore.
[47°09′48″S, 126°43′06″W] Reading: 1.39 Sv
@movq You're good, it's POSIX-compliant. ;-) I also was taught $* first instead of "$@". Looks like a common thing. :-) Shell has just soooooo many quirks and inconsistencies, it is quite hard to master it. But we'll never get rid of it.
(I think I first saw for i; do in Shell-Skript Programmierung by Patrick Ditchen from 2008: German excerpt. They didn’t mention any restrictions on shell versions and I’ve been using it for ages. 😅 (I’m not too happy that the book uses for i in $* as the default template instead of for i in "$@". The book doesn’t care too much about file names with spaces in them.))
(I think I first saw for i; do in Shell-Skript Programmierung by Patrick Ditchen from 2008: German excerpt. They didn’t mention any restrictions on shell versions and I’ve been using it for ages. 😅 (I’m not too happy that the book uses for i in $* as the default template instead of for i in "$@". The book doesn’t care too much about file names with spaces in them.))
(I think I first saw for i; do in Shell-Skript Programmierung by Patrick Ditchen from 2008: German excerpt. They didn’t mention any restrictions on shell versions and I’ve been using it for ages. 😅 (I’m not too happy that the book uses for i in $* as the default template instead of for i in "$@". The book doesn’t care too much about file names with spaces in them.))
I wonder what Google would even bother to care about Firefox. According to https://netmarketshare.com, Firefox’s market share is around 5% on desktops. That’s still too much for Google, huh?
I wonder what Google would even bother to care about Firefox. According to https://netmarketshare.com, Firefox’s market share is around 5% on desktops. That’s still too much for Google, huh?
I wonder what Google would even bother to care about Firefox. According to https://netmarketshare.com, Firefox’s market share is around 5% on desktops. That’s still too much for Google, huh?
[47°09′23″S, 126°43′15″W] --no signal--
@lyse Oops, I must confess that I didn’t check whether that’s POSIX or not. 😬 So, thanks for the link. 👍
It really is a shame that there’s no guarantee that a shebang of #!/bin/sh enforces true and strict POSIX-conformity. This is all so fragile. 😞
@lyse Oops, I must confess that I didn’t check whether that’s POSIX or not. 😬 So, thanks for the link. 👍
It really is a shame that there’s no guarantee that a shebang of #!/bin/sh enforces true and strict POSIX-conformity. This is all so fragile. 😞
@lyse Oops, I must confess that I didn’t check whether that’s POSIX or not. 😬 So, thanks for the link. 👍
It really is a shame that there’s no guarantee that a shebang of #!/bin/sh enforces true and strict POSIX-conformity. This is all so fragile. 😞
@xuu And what fucking useless ass project would that happen to be?! 🤔 I must have missed that.
@xuu And what fucking useless ass project would that happen to be?! 🤔 I must have missed that.
@xuu And what fucking useless ass project would that happen to be?! 🤔 I must have missed that.
@xuu What what fucking useless ass project would that happen to be?! 🤔 I must have missed that.
@prologic the going theory is that openAI announced a new product that pretty much blew up the project of one of the board members. So that board member got 3 others to vote to fire Sam.
@prologic the going theory is that openAI announced a new product that pretty much blew up the project of one of the board members. So that board member got 3 others to vote to fire Sam.
[47°09′22″S, 126°43′26″W] Reading: 1.52000 PPM
[M [02;01;02]: 90'](https://staystrong.run/user/bmallred/activity/c5448a5d-4e81-4f42-9d0a-f425018ab8b8): 9.25 miles, 00:08:51 average pace, 01:21:46 duration
one of those runs you don't want to stop. great pace where it felt like i was pushing enough and also allowing myself to recover. had to call it quits with about 9 minutes left due to a weird pain in the left heel. feels fine now but being cautious. ready for a rest day tomorrow!
#running
Pinellas County - 90': 9.25 miles, 00:08:51 average pace, 01:21:46 duration
one of those runs you do not want to stop. great pace where it felt like i was pushing enough and also allowing myself to recover. had to call it quits with about 9 minutes left due to a weird pain in the left heel. feels fine now but being cautious. ready for a rest day tomorrow!
#running
Pinellas County - 90': 9.25 miles, 00:08:51 average pace, 01:21:46 duration
one of those runs you do not want to stop. great pace where it felt like i was pushing enough and also allowing myself to recover. had to call it quits with about 9 minutes left due to a weird pain in the left heel. feels fine now but being cautious. ready for a rest day tomorrow!
#running
Pinellas County - 90': 9.25 miles, 00:08:51 average pace, 01:21:46 duration
one of those runs you do not want to stop. great pace where it felt like i was pushing enough and also allowing myself to recover. had to call it quits with about 9 minutes left due to a weird pain in the left heel. feels fine now but being cautious. ready for a rest day tomorrow!
#running
[47°09′08″S, 126°43′27″W] Raw reading: 0x655C6381, offset +/-3
[47°09′37″S, 126°43′40″W] Raw reading: 0x655C4761, offset +/-2
This war on adblockers by Google is particularly interesting with the way they're doubling down so desperately.
For one thing I bet their higher ups making these decisions probably run adblockers themselves, but the other thing is it's arguably downright dangerous to not use at least a basic adblocker.
And I'm not even talking about the wider web, I mean even on YouTube itself. It's plagued with scam ads, nsfw ads (ironic given how YT insists the content creators have to keep things clean to satisfy the ad payers) and even ads that'll lead to actual malware, if not spyware.
YouTube, if you can't even moderate your ad network properly, let alone the fact that at the very least they are WAY too frequent/obnoxious, you cannot insist on people disabling their adblocker
This war on adblockers by Google is particularly interesting with the way they're doubling down so desperately.
For one thing I bet they're higher ups making these decisions probably run adblockers themselves, but the other thing is it's arguably downright dangerous to not use at least a basic adblocker.
And I'm not even talking about the wider web, I mean even on YouTube itself. It's plagued with scam ads, nsfw ads (ironic given how YT insists the content creators have to keep things clean to satisfy the ad payers) and even ads that'll lead to actual malware, if not spyware.
YouTube, if you can't even moderate your ad network properly, let alone the fact that at the very least they are WAY too frequent/obnoxious, you cannot insist on people disabling their adblocker
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:2 TWTS:791 ARCHIVED:67915 CACHE:2346 FOLLOWERS:14 FOLLOWING:14
@lyse I meant castle 🤦♂️
@lyse I meant castle 🤦♂️
@lyse I meant castle 🤦♂️
@darch I'll have a look later this week if you can remind me 🙏