# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
# 
# Usage:
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users              View list of users and latest twt date.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt                View all twts.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri  View all mentions for uri.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash         View all twts for a conversation subject.
# 
# Options:
#     uri     Filter to show a specific users twts.
#     offset  Start index for quey.
#     limit   Count of items to return (going back in time).
# 
# twt range = 1 196312
# self = https://watcher.sour.is?offset=161358
# next = https://watcher.sour.is?offset=161458
# prev = https://watcher.sour.is?offset=161258
stats
yarn.meff.me
View Thread
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:2 TWTS:961 ARCHIVED:71927 CACHE:2437 FOLLOWERS:15 FOLLOWING:14
@rlafuente@ciberlandia.pt
ciberlandia.pt
View Thread
A Nokia Art Jam organizada pelo @Polyducks@Polyducks é até 30 de maio!

https://itch.io/jam/nokiaartjam-2 Promo da Nokia Art Jam 2023, com vários ecrãs nokia a mostrar diferentes ilustrações 1-bit
@rlafuente@ciberlandia.pt
ciberlandia.pt
View Thread
A Nokia Art Jam organizada pelo @Polyducks@Polyducks é até 30 de maio!

https://itch.io/jam/nokiaartjam-2 Promo da Nokia Art Jam 2023, com vários ecrãs nokia a mostrar diferentes ilustrações 1-bit
mckinley-cc
mckinley.cc
View Thread
Viddy, a modern watch(1) alternative with paging, visual diffs, and history: https://github.com/sachaos/viddy
bender
twtxt.net
View Thread
@prologic will miss the first couple, but will sure join when we return from vacations! 😊
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@mckinley It’s probably a bit faster, but not much. Maybe 20-30 MByte/s (I watched one 40 GB file being copied and it took 20-30 minutes or something like that.)

I need to optimize this. 🥴
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@mckinley It’s probably a bit faster, but not much. Maybe 20-30 MByte/s (I watched one 40 GB file being copied and it took 20-30 minutes or something like that.)

I need to optimize this. 🥴
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@mckinley It’s probably a bit faster, but not much. Maybe 20-30 MByte/s (I watched one 40 GB file being copied and it took 20-30 minutes or something like that.)

I need to optimize this. 🥴
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@mckinley It’s probably a bit faster, but not much. Maybe 20-30 MByte/s (I watched one 40 GB file being copied and it took 20-30 minutes or something like that.)

I need to optimize this. 🥴
lyse
lyse.isobeef.org
View Thread
@prologic Kehrwoche! :-)
lyse
lyse.isobeef.org
View Thread
@prologic I noted it in my calendar, looking forward to it. :-)
terron
duque-terron.cat
View Thread
No fotos!
/https://duque-terron.cat/media/photos/photo_13907-05-2024_19-28-59.jpg) #catsoftwtxt
terron
duque-terron.cat
View Thread
No fotos!
#catsoftwtxt
terron
duque-terron.cat
View Thread
No fotos!
#catsoftwtxt
terron
duque-terron.cat
View Thread
/https://duque-terron.cat/media/photos/photo_13807-05-2024_19-22-10.jpg) #catsoftwtxt
terron
duque-terron.cat
View Thread
#catsoftwtxt
terron
duque-terron.cat
View Thread
#catsoftwtxt
lyse
lyse.isobeef.org
View Thread
@prologic Cool!
@jo
comam.es
View Thread
[47°09′43″S, 126°43′56″W] Transponder still failing
lyse
lyse.isobeef.org
View Thread
@movq I'm subscribed to 48 feeds at the moment. And only a fraction is actually active.
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
The “annoying” thing about hardware these days is that it basically keeps working “forever”. At least much, much longer that you’d expect.

Now that I think about it … I only remember *one* PC of mine actually dying because of a hardware failure – and that was probably because I did too much overclocking. 😂 If it wasn’t for changes in *software*, I could probably still use them all. I mean, why not, my Pentium 133 still works and I use it for gaming regularly.

So … my little NAS probably won’t die any time soon. Hmmm.
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
The “annoying” thing about hardware these days is that it basically keeps working “forever”. At least much, much longer that you’d expect.

Now that I think about it … I only remember *one* PC of mine actually dying because of a hardware failure – and that was probably because I did too much overclocking. 😂 If it wasn’t for changes in *software*, I could probably still use them all. I mean, why not, my Pentium 133 still works and I use it for gaming regularly.

So … my little NAS probably won’t die any time soon. Hmmm.
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
The “annoying” thing about hardware these days is that it basically keeps working “forever”. At least much, much longer that you’d expect.

Now that I think about it … I only remember *one* PC of mine actually dying because of a hardware failure – and that was probably because I did too much overclocking. 😂 If it wasn’t for changes in *software*, I could probably still use them all. I mean, why not, my Pentium 133 still works and I use it for gaming regularly.

So … my little NAS probably won’t die any time soon. Hmmm.
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
The “annoying” thing about hardware these days is that it basically keeps working “forever”. At least much, much longer that you’d expect.

Now that I think about it … I only remember *one* PC of mine actually dying because of a hardware failure – and that was probably because I did too much overclocking. 😂 If it wasn’t for changes in *software*, I could probably still use them all. I mean, why not, my Pentium 133 still works and I use it for gaming regularly.

So … my little NAS probably won’t die any time soon. Hmmm.
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@mckinley Not really sure, to be honest. _Probably_ a couple hundred GB … ? 🤔 With the *changed* data, it might be half a TB to transfer? I’m just guessing.

Let’s see how it goes next time. I don’t expect to add much data any time soon. (On the other hand, I’ll swap the USB disks for the next run, so it’ll take the same ~9 hours, again. Meh.)

I think the solution is to have less data. 😈~
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@mckinley Not really sure, to be honest. _Probably_ a couple hundred GB … ? 🤔 With the *changed* data, it might be half a TB to transfer? I’m just guessing.

Let’s see how it goes next time. I don’t expect to add much data any time soon. (On the other hand, I’ll swap the USB disks for the next run, so it’ll take the same ~9 hours, again. Meh.)

I think the solution is to have less data. 😈~
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@mckinley Not really sure, to be honest. _Probably_ a couple hundred GB … ? 🤔 With the *changed* data, it might be half a TB to transfer? I’m just guessing.

Let’s see how it goes next time. I don’t expect to add much data any time soon. (On the other hand, I’ll swap the USB disks for the next run, so it’ll take the same ~9 hours, again. Meh.)

I think the solution is to have less data. 😈~
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@mckinley Not really sure, to be honest. _Probably_ a couple hundred GB … ? 🤔 With the *changed* data, it might be half a TB to transfer? I’m just guessing.

Let’s see how it goes next time. I don’t expect to add much data any time soon. (On the other hand, I’ll swap the USB disks for the next run, so it’ll take the same ~9 hours, again. Meh.)

I think the solution is to have less data. 😈~
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@lyse Yeah, only ~30 of the ~133 feeds I’m following have had a twt in the last month … 56 in the last year. Some had their last twt in 2016. 🫤
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@lyse Yeah, only ~30 of the ~133 feeds I’m following have had a twt in the last month … 56 in the last year. Some had their last twt in 2016. 🫤
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@lyse Yeah, only ~30 of the ~133 feeds I’m following have had a twt in the last month … 56 in the last year. Some had their last twt in 2016. 🫤
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@lyse Yeah, only ~30 of the ~133 feeds I’m following have had a twt in the last month … 56 in the last year. Some had their last twt in 2016. 🫤
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@aelaraji Ahh no worries! 😉 I _hope_ the docs are okay 👌
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@aelaraji Ahh no worries! 😉 I _hope_ the docs are okay 👌
aelaraji
aelaraji.com
View Thread
@prologic Checking it out right away! Thanks!
aelaraji
aelaraji.com
View Thread
@prologic Checking it out right away! Thanks!
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@slashdot Good, those US congressmen are fucking idiots I swear to god 🤣 They don't know the difference between China, Taiwan, Singapore or Thailand if they fell over those countries backwards 😅 Bunch of old farts 💨
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@slashdot Good, those US congressmen are fucking idiots I swear to god 🤣 They don't know the difference between China, Taiwan, Singapore or Thailand if they fell over those countries backwards 😅 Bunch of old farts 💨
@jo
comam.es
View Thread
[47°09′41″S, 126°43′55″W] Transponder malfunction
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
I _think_ I found the bug 🐛
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
I _think_ I found the bug 🐛
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
I just dropped another 124 useless accounts 🥳
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
I just dropped another 124 useless accounts 🥳
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq I did indeed edit a Twt just now 🤣 probably from this thread IIRC (typo) 😅
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq I did indeed edit a Twt just now 🤣 probably from this thread IIRC (typo) 😅
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq I know right 😅 This can't be true, I must be over reacting and something else is fucked up with some code somewhere 🤣
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq I know right 😅 This can't be true, I must be over reacting and something else is fucked up with some code somewhere 🤣
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic From the DOM? That can’t be right. 😳😳😳
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic From the DOM? That can’t be right. 😳😳😳
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic From the DOM? That can’t be right. 😳😳😳
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic From the DOM? That can’t be right. 😳😳😳
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic It always fetches the canonical feed URL and, when it can’t find the latest twt hash (that it saw in the previous run) it traverses the archived feeds until it does find it. Something along those lines.

I just got one such notification:

Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 15:56:01 +0200
From: me@pinguin
To: me@pinguin
Subject: [regularly] jenny

Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/1 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)
Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/2 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)
Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/3 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)
Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/4 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)
Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/5 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)

Now, your feed did *not* get archived, as far as I can tell. So why am I getting this then? Have you edited a twt just now? That would explain it. 😅
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic It always fetches the canonical feed URL and, when it can’t find the latest twt hash (that it saw in the previous run) it traverses the archived feeds until it does find it. Something along those lines.

I just got one such notification:

Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 15:56:01 +0200
From: me@pinguin
To: me@pinguin
Subject: [regularly] jenny

Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/1 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)
Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/2 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)
Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/3 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)
Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/4 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)
Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/5 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)

Now, your feed did *not* get archived, as far as I can tell. So why am I getting this then? Have you edited a twt just now? That would explain it. 😅
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic It always fetches the canonical feed URL and, when it can’t find the latest twt hash (that it saw in the previous run) it traverses the archived feeds until it does find it. Something along those lines.

I just got one such notification:

Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 15:56:01 +0200
From: me@pinguin
To: me@pinguin
Subject: [regularly] jenny

Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/1 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)
Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/2 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)
Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/3 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)
Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/4 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)
Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/5 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)

Now, your feed did *not* get archived, as far as I can tell. So why am I getting this then? Have you edited a twt just now? That would explain it. 😅
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic It always fetches the canonical feed URL and, when it can’t find the latest twt hash (that it saw in the previous run) it traverses the archived feeds until it does find it. Something along those lines.

I just got one such notification:

Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 15:56:01 +0200
From: me@pinguin
To: me@pinguin
Subject: \n jenny

Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/1 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)
Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/2 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)
Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/3 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)
Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/4 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)
Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/5 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)

Now, your feed did *not* get archived, as far as I can tell. So why am I getting this then? Have you edited a twt just now? That would explain it. 😅
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic It always fetches the canonical feed URL and, when it can’t find the latest twt hash (that it saw in the previous run) it traverses the archived feeds until it does find it. Something along those lines.

I just got one such notification:

Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 15:56:01 +0200
From: me@pinguin
To: me@pinguin
Subject: [regularly] jenny

Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/1 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)
Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/2 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)
Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/3 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)
Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/4 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)
Fetching archived feed https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt/5 (configured as prologic, https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt)

Now, your feed did *not* get archived, as far as I can tell. So why am I getting this then? Have you edited a twt just now? That would explain it. 😅
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
Or maybe someone added some janky javascript into the codebase I can't find 🤔
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
Or maybe someone added some janky javascript into the codebase I can't find 🤔
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq No it's stripping it from the DOM. The server is sending a document with fragments in the URI(s) of links that are 'Inreply-to" links (for context). Chrome is stripping them!
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq No it's stripping it from the DOM. The server is sending a document with fragments in the URI(s) of links that are 'Inreply-to" links (for context). Chrome is stripping them!
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@lyse Fair enough, I mean I have the same sets of problems too.
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@lyse Fair enough, I mean I have the same sets of problems too.
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic Strip it from what? From requests being sent to the server? That’s always been the case, afaik. 🤔
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic Strip it from what? From requests being sent to the server? That’s always been the case, afaik. 🤔
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic Strip it from what? From requests being sent to the server? That’s always been the case, afaik. 🤔
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic Strip it from what? From requests being sent to the server? That’s always been the case, afaik. 🤔
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq Noice 👌
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq Noice 👌
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq Oh, and then it switches to the new active feed? 🤔
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq Oh, and then it switches to the new active feed? 🤔
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq It appears to strip the #rafgment 🤦‍♂️
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq It appears to strip the #fragment 🤦‍♂️
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq It appears to strip the #fragment 🤦‍♂️
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic Huh? What does that look like in Chrome? 🤔 (I only have Chromium.)
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic Huh? What does that look like in Chrome? 🤔 (I only have Chromium.)
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic Huh? What does that look like in Chrome? 🤔 (I only have Chromium.)
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic Huh? What does that look like in Chrome? 🤔 (I only have Chromium.)
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
👋 Okay folks, let's startup the Yarn.social calls again.

- Event: Yarn.social Online Meetup
- When: 25th May 2024 at 12:00pm UTC (midday)
- Where: Mills Meet : Yarn.social
- Cadence: 4th Saturday of every Month

Agenda:

> Anything we want to talk about. Twtxt, Yarn, self hosting, cool stuff you've been working on. chit-chat, whatever 😅

#Yarn.social #Meetup
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
👋 Okay folks, let's startup the Yarn.social calls again.

- Event: Yarn.social Online Meetup
- When: 25th May 2024 at 12:00pm UTC (midday)
- Where: Mills Meet : Yarn.social
- Cadence: 4th Saturday of every Month

#Yarn.social #Meetup
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
👋 Okay folks, let's startup the Yarn.social calls again.

- Event: Yarn.social Online Meetup
- When: 25th May 2024 at 12:00pm UTC (midday)
- Where: Mills Meet : Yarn.social
- Cadence: 4th Saturday of every Month

Agenda:

> Anything we want to talk about. Twtxt, Yarn, self hosting, cool stuff you've been working on. chit-chat, whatever 😅

#Yarn.social #Meetup
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic My client tells me when it fetches archived feeds. That’s all.
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic My client tells me when it fetches archived feeds. That’s all.
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic My client tells me when it fetches archived feeds. That’s all.
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic My client tells me when it fetches archived feeds. That’s all.
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic Ah, yes, that’s better! 👍
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic Ah, yes, that’s better! 👍
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic Ah, yes, that’s better! 👍
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@prologic Ah, yes, that’s better! 👍
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
Testing (please ignore)

https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=TEMPLATE&tmeid=MDJuM2hzNThvaWsydTdoa3B2ODl0dGxlZzFfMjAyNDA1MjVUMTIwMDAwWiBwcm9sb2dpY0BzaG9ydGNpcmN1aXQubmV0LmF1&tmsrc=prologic%40shortcircuit.net.au&scp=ALL">https://www.google.com/calendar/images/ext/gc_button1_en.gif">_
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq Fixed 👌
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq Fixed 👌
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@lyse Anyway fixed 👌
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@lyse Anyway fixed 👌
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
I just realized something that's completely fucked up.


$ curl -qssL https://twtxt.net/ | grep -E 'In-reply-to' | head
<a href="https://twtxt.net/conv/2tjsjuq?p=1#rlsxhsq" title="Show conversation for #2tjsjuq">In-reply-to</a>
<a href="https://twtxt.net/conv/bghmkra?p=1#dfnrbyq" title="Show conversation for #bghmkra">In-reply-to</a>
<a href="https://twtxt.net/conv/e24exeq?p=1#itft6wa" title="Show conversation for #e24exeq">In-reply-to</a>


For some reason the latest version of Chrome is stripped #fragment(s) from the HTML body being served.

da fuq?! When did this change, in what version? Did we (W3C and the community) agree that this behavior should change?! 😱 Fark'n hell Google™ Chrome 🤬
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
I just realized something that's completely fucked up.


$ curl -qssL https://twtxt.net/ | grep -E 'In-reply-to' | head
<a href="https://twtxt.net/conv/2tjsjuq?p=1#rlsxhsq" title="Show conversation for #2tjsjuq">In-reply-to</a>
<a href="https://twtxt.net/conv/bghmkra?p=1#dfnrbyq" title="Show conversation for #bghmkra">In-reply-to</a>
<a href="https://twtxt.net/conv/e24exeq?p=1#itft6wa" title="Show conversation for #e24exeq">In-reply-to</a>


For some reason the latest version of Chrome is stripped #fragment(s) from the HTML body being served.

da fuq?! When did this change, in what version? Did we (W3C and the community) agree that this behavior should change?! 😱 Fark'n hell Google™ Chrome 🤬
bmallred
nahongvita.run
View Thread
Pinellas County - Base: 4.69 miles, 00:09:21 average pace, 00:43:51 duration
psh, was supposed to be base but the damn heat and humidity really brought that heart rate up. the last mile i felt it and was done w/ only three minutes left on the timer.
#running
bmallred
staystrong.run
View Thread
Pinellas County - Base: 4.69 miles, 00:09:21 average pace, 00:43:51 duration
psh, was supposed to be a base but the damn heat and humidity really brought that HR up. the last mile i felt it and was done with only three minutes left on the timer.
#running
bmallred
staystrong.run
View Thread
Pinellas County - Base: 4.69 miles, 00:09:21 average pace, 00:43:51 duration
psh, was supposed to be a base but the damn heat and humidity really brought that HR up. the last mile i felt it and was done with only three minutes left on the timer.
#running
bmallred
nahongvita.run
View Thread
Pinellas County - Base: 4.69 miles, 00:09:21 average pace, 00:43:51 duration
psh, was supposed to be a base but the damn heat and humidity really brought that HR up. the last mile i felt it and was done with only three minutes left on the timer.
#running
lyse
lyse.isobeef.org
View Thread
@prologic Oh, was I? I don't recall any of that. But who knows. ;-)