# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
# 
# Usage:
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users              View list of users and latest twt date.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt                View all twts.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri  View all mentions for uri.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash         View all twts for a conversation subject.
# 
# Options:
#     uri     Filter to show a specific users twts.
#     offset  Start index for quey.
#     limit   Count of items to return (going back in time).
# 
# twt range = 1 196309
# self = https://watcher.sour.is?offset=161425
# next = https://watcher.sour.is?offset=161525
# prev = https://watcher.sour.is?offset=161325
@mckinley Ahh that is clever indeed šŸ‘Œ You're essentiall creating FIFO pipes with >(..) 🧐
@mckinley Ahh that is clever indeed šŸ‘Œ You're essentiall creating FIFO pipes with >(..) 🧐


> Deeply questionable legality aside, do any of you use Copilot? Has it had any material impact on your programming work? Is its use allowed by your employer, or do you only use it for personal projects at home?

No never and I never will!


> Deeply questionable legality aside, do any of you use Copilot? Has it had any material impact on your programming work? Is its use allowed by your employer, or do you only use it for personal projects at home?

No never and I never will!
@osnews

> As an aside, my opinion on GitHub Copilot is clear – it’s quite possibly the largest case of copyright infringement in human history, and in its current incarnation it should not be allowed to continue to operate. As I wrote over a year ago:

I wrote about this three years ag! https://www.prologic.blog/2021/07/11/why-i-no.html
@osnews

> As an aside, my opinion on GitHub Copilot is clear – it’s quite possibly the largest case of copyright infringement in human history, and in its current incarnation it should not be allowed to continue to operate. As I wrote over a year ago:

I wrote about this three years ag! https://www.prologic.blog/2021/07/11/why-i-no.html
Sounds perfect šŸ‘Œ
Sounds perfect šŸ‘Œ
Follow-up question:

What do we call it when you get to engage in discussion over topics you find in these "filter bubbles" with a different viewpoint, only to be shot down, overridden, or met with other arguments that support the existing "filter bubble"'s state?
Follow-up question:

What do we call it when you get to engage in discussion over topics you find in these "filter bubbles" with a different viewpoint, only to be shot down, overridden, or met with other arguments that support the existing "filter bubble"'s state?
@aelaraji Bingo!

> Consequently, users become separated from information that disagrees with their viewpoints, effectively isolating them in their own cultural or ideological bubbles, resulting in a limited and customized view of the world.
@aelaraji Bingo!

> Consequently, users become separated from information that disagrees with their viewpoints, effectively isolating them in their own cultural or ideological bubbles, resulting in a limited and customized view of the world.
Recovery: 3.11 miles, 00:10:55 average pace, 00:33:54 duration

#running #treadmill
Recovery: 3.11 miles, 00:10:55 average pace, 00:33:54 duration

#running #treadmill
Recovery: 3.11 miles, 00:10:55 average pace, 00:33:54 duration

#running #treadmill
Recovery: 3.11 miles, 00:10:55 average pace, 00:33:54 duration

#running #treadmill
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:2 TWTS:962 ARCHIVED:71942 CACHE:2449 FOLLOWERS:15 FOLLOWING:14
Aqui no prédio tem havido um recrudescimento das cambriolagens Nota num prédio em francês, que começa por "Devant la recrudescence de cambriolages au sein de votre coproprieté..."
Aqui no prédio tem havido um recrudescimento das cambriolagens Nota num prédio em francês, que começa por "Devant la recrudescence de cambriolages au sein de votre coproprieté..."
@Rob Coming from HTTP and discovered both at the same time, my preference might be biased towards Gemini because of the content syntax but I love both equally.
@Rob Coming from HTTP and discovered both at the same time, my preference might be biased towards Gemini because of the content syntax but I love both equally.
@prologic hmm... it sounds like being stuck in a "Filter bubble". šŸ¤”
@prologic hmm... it sounds like being stuck in a "Filter bubble". šŸ¤”
It's a beautiful day in the neighborhood.
@movq sounds like a very good place to start! 😊
@Rob you forgot to add ā€œsaid no oneā€. 🤭
[47°09′52″S, 126°43′28″W] Bad satellite signal -- switching to analog communication
@prologic Doesn’t matter. Far, far away! From everything! That’s where I’d go. šŸ˜‚
@prologic Doesn’t matter. Far, far away! From everything! That’s where I’d go. šŸ˜‚
@prologic Doesn’t matter. Far, far away! From everything! That’s where I’d go. šŸ˜‚
@prologic Doesn’t matter. Far, far away! From everything! That’s where I’d go. šŸ˜‚
Ran a few tests.

Copying data from the NAS’s encrypted ZFS pool to the USB disk’s encrypted btrfs runs at ~20 MByte/s. That is for a single 1 GB file of random data. Cold caches, sync included.

That same USB disk with the same btrfs can sustain ~75 MByte/s when I use it on my workstation (i7-3770).

And indeed, the aes flag does not show up in the output of lscpu on the NAS.

I’ll try to tweak some things about this, but it might be time for an upgrade … 🫤 (Or I’ll have to re-think the entire thing somehow.)
Ran a few tests.

Copying data from the NAS’s encrypted ZFS pool to the USB disk’s encrypted btrfs runs at ~20 MByte/s. That is for a single 1 GB file of random data. Cold caches, sync included.

That same USB disk with the same btrfs can sustain ~75 MByte/s when I use it on my workstation (i7-3770).

And indeed, the aes flag does not show up in the output of lscpu on the NAS.

I’ll try to tweak some things about this, but it might be time for an upgrade … 🫤 (Or I’ll have to re-think the entire thing somehow.)
Ran a few tests.

Copying data from the NAS’s encrypted ZFS pool to the USB disk’s encrypted btrfs runs at ~20 MByte/s. That is for a single 1 GB file of random data. Cold caches, sync included.

That same USB disk with the same btrfs can sustain ~75 MByte/s when I use it on my workstation (i7-3770).

And indeed, the aes flag does not show up in the output of lscpu on the NAS.

I’ll try to tweak some things about this, but it might be time for an upgrade … 🫤 (Or I’ll have to re-think the entire thing somehow.)
Ran a few tests.

Copying data from the NAS’s encrypted ZFS pool to the USB disk’s encrypted btrfs runs at ~20 MByte/s. That is for a single 1 GB file of random data. Cold caches, sync included.

That same USB disk with the same btrfs can sustain ~75 MByte/s when I use it on my workstation (i7-3770).

And indeed, the aes flag does not show up in the output of lscpu on the NAS.

I’ll try to tweak some things about this, but it might be time for an upgrade … 🫤 (Or I’ll have to re-think the entire thing somehow.)
echo chambers?
echo chambers?
echo chambers?
echo chambers?
[47°09′31″S, 126°43′35″W] --no signal--
A @aiscarvalho e eu aterramos agora em Nantes para seguir para Rennes, amanhã começa a #libregraphicsmeeting!

Nestes dias conto tootar sobre o evento a partir da minha conta anglófona @rlafuente@rlafuente. Até jÔ*

https://libregraphicsmeeting.org/2024

#lgm2024
A @aiscarvalho e eu aterramos agora em Nantes para seguir para Rennes, amanhã começa a #libregraphicsmeeting!

Nestes dias conto tootar sobre o evento a partir da minha conta anglófona @rlafuente@rlafuente. Até jÔ*

https://libregraphicsmeeting.org/2024

#lgm2024
@lyse Where to? šŸ¤”
@lyse Where to? šŸ¤”
What's that thing called when everyone on a social media platform (_hardly matters which one_) all post the same sort of thing. It all sounds oh so wonderful, or all so dramatic, everyone claps and cheers and thumbs up or whatever. What's that thing called? There's a term for it hmmm 🧐
What's that thing called when everyone on a social media platform (_hardly matters which one_) all post the same sort of thing. It all sounds oh so wonderful, or all so dramatic, everyone claps and cheers and thumbs up or whatever. What's that thing called? There's a term for it hmmm 🧐
All packed, ready to go.
> Use your energy šŸ’Ŗ
> Use your energy šŸ’Ŗ
[47°09′53″S, 126°43′46″W] Saalmi, retransmit, please
@mckinley That's a cool idea!
[47°09′47″S, 126°43′43″W] --white noise--
we'll just have to run another one in early June just for you šŸ˜…
we'll just have to run another one in early June just for you šŸ˜…
@bender LOL well I've scheduled it for the end of the month šŸ˜†
@bender LOL well I've scheduled it for the end of the month šŸ˜†
@dbucklin Nice quote šŸ‘Œ
@dbucklin Nice quote šŸ‘Œ
[47°09′32″S, 126°43′03″W] Transponder fixed
I don't pretend to have all the answers. I don't pretend to even know what the questions are. Hey, where am I? - wigums
I don't pretend to have all the answers. I don't pretend to even know what the questions are. Hey, where am I? - wigums
I don't pretend to have all the answers. I don't pretend to even know what the questions are. Hey, where am I? - wigums
@prologic towards the end of the month.
@mckinley looks nice! šŸ‘Œ
@mckinley looks nice! šŸ‘Œ
When do you get back from your holiday? šŸ¤”
When do you get back from your holiday? šŸ¤”
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:2 TWTS:961 ARCHIVED:71927 CACHE:2437 FOLLOWERS:15 FOLLOWING:14
A Nokia Art Jam organizada pelo @Polyducks@Polyducks Ʃ atƩ 30 de maio!

https://itch.io/jam/nokiaartjam-2 Promo da Nokia Art Jam 2023, com vÔrios ecrãs nokia a mostrar diferentes ilustrações 1-bit
A Nokia Art Jam organizada pelo @Polyducks@Polyducks Ʃ atƩ 30 de maio!

https://itch.io/jam/nokiaartjam-2 Promo da Nokia Art Jam 2023, com vÔrios ecrãs nokia a mostrar diferentes ilustrações 1-bit
Viddy, a modern watch(1) alternative with paging, visual diffs, and history: https://github.com/sachaos/viddy
@prologic will miss the first couple, but will sure join when we return from vacations! 😊
@mckinley It’s probably a bit faster, but not much. Maybe 20-30 MByte/s (I watched one 40 GB file being copied and it took 20-30 minutes or something like that.)

I need to optimize this. 🄓
@mckinley It’s probably a bit faster, but not much. Maybe 20-30 MByte/s (I watched one 40 GB file being copied and it took 20-30 minutes or something like that.)

I need to optimize this. 🄓
@mckinley It’s probably a bit faster, but not much. Maybe 20-30 MByte/s (I watched one 40 GB file being copied and it took 20-30 minutes or something like that.)

I need to optimize this. 🄓
@mckinley It’s probably a bit faster, but not much. Maybe 20-30 MByte/s (I watched one 40 GB file being copied and it took 20-30 minutes or something like that.)

I need to optimize this. 🄓
@prologic Kehrwoche! :-)
@prologic I noted it in my calendar, looking forward to it. :-)
No fotos!
/https://duque-terron.cat/media/photos/photo_13907-05-2024_19-28-59.jpg) #catsoftwtxt
No fotos!
#catsoftwtxt
No fotos!
#catsoftwtxt
/https://duque-terron.cat/media/photos/photo_13807-05-2024_19-22-10.jpg) #catsoftwtxt
#catsoftwtxt
#catsoftwtxt
@prologic Cool!
[47°09′43″S, 126°43′56″W] Transponder still failing
@movq I'm subscribed to 48 feeds at the moment. And only a fraction is actually active.
The ā€œannoyingā€ thing about hardware these days is that it basically keeps working ā€œforeverā€. At least much, much longer that you’d expect.

Now that I think about it … I only remember *one* PC of mine actually dying because of a hardware failure – and that was probably because I did too much overclocking. šŸ˜‚ If it wasn’t for changes in *software*, I could probably still use them all. I mean, why not, my Pentium 133 still works and I use it for gaming regularly.

So … my little NAS probably won’t die any time soon. Hmmm.
The ā€œannoyingā€ thing about hardware these days is that it basically keeps working ā€œforeverā€. At least much, much longer that you’d expect.

Now that I think about it … I only remember *one* PC of mine actually dying because of a hardware failure – and that was probably because I did too much overclocking. šŸ˜‚ If it wasn’t for changes in *software*, I could probably still use them all. I mean, why not, my Pentium 133 still works and I use it for gaming regularly.

So … my little NAS probably won’t die any time soon. Hmmm.
The ā€œannoyingā€ thing about hardware these days is that it basically keeps working ā€œforeverā€. At least much, much longer that you’d expect.

Now that I think about it … I only remember *one* PC of mine actually dying because of a hardware failure – and that was probably because I did too much overclocking. šŸ˜‚ If it wasn’t for changes in *software*, I could probably still use them all. I mean, why not, my Pentium 133 still works and I use it for gaming regularly.

So … my little NAS probably won’t die any time soon. Hmmm.
The ā€œannoyingā€ thing about hardware these days is that it basically keeps working ā€œforeverā€. At least much, much longer that you’d expect.

Now that I think about it … I only remember *one* PC of mine actually dying because of a hardware failure – and that was probably because I did too much overclocking. šŸ˜‚ If it wasn’t for changes in *software*, I could probably still use them all. I mean, why not, my Pentium 133 still works and I use it for gaming regularly.

So … my little NAS probably won’t die any time soon. Hmmm.
@mckinley Not really sure, to be honest. _Probably_ a couple hundred GB … ? šŸ¤” With the *changed* data, it might be half a TB to transfer? I’m just guessing.

Let’s see how it goes next time. I don’t expect to add much data any time soon. (On the other hand, I’ll swap the USB disks for the next run, so it’ll take the same ~9 hours, again. Meh.)

I think the solution is to have less data. 😈~
@mckinley Not really sure, to be honest. _Probably_ a couple hundred GB … ? šŸ¤” With the *changed* data, it might be half a TB to transfer? I’m just guessing.

Let’s see how it goes next time. I don’t expect to add much data any time soon. (On the other hand, I’ll swap the USB disks for the next run, so it’ll take the same ~9 hours, again. Meh.)

I think the solution is to have less data. 😈~
@mckinley Not really sure, to be honest. _Probably_ a couple hundred GB … ? šŸ¤” With the *changed* data, it might be half a TB to transfer? I’m just guessing.

Let’s see how it goes next time. I don’t expect to add much data any time soon. (On the other hand, I’ll swap the USB disks for the next run, so it’ll take the same ~9 hours, again. Meh.)

I think the solution is to have less data. 😈~
@mckinley Not really sure, to be honest. _Probably_ a couple hundred GB … ? šŸ¤” With the *changed* data, it might be half a TB to transfer? I’m just guessing.

Let’s see how it goes next time. I don’t expect to add much data any time soon. (On the other hand, I’ll swap the USB disks for the next run, so it’ll take the same ~9 hours, again. Meh.)

I think the solution is to have less data. 😈~
@lyse Yeah, only ~30 of the ~133 feeds I’m following have had a twt in the last month … 56 in the last year. Some had their last twt in 2016. 🫤
@lyse Yeah, only ~30 of the ~133 feeds I’m following have had a twt in the last month … 56 in the last year. Some had their last twt in 2016. 🫤
@lyse Yeah, only ~30 of the ~133 feeds I’m following have had a twt in the last month … 56 in the last year. Some had their last twt in 2016. 🫤
@lyse Yeah, only ~30 of the ~133 feeds I’m following have had a twt in the last month … 56 in the last year. Some had their last twt in 2016. 🫤
@aelaraji Ahh no worries! šŸ˜‰ I _hope_ the docs are okay šŸ‘Œ