I just took the longest time I could on the loan, to have a low price each month, and then i just pay extra whenever I can to get it payed down faster.
Luckily the Marlyn, my son, and my daughter all fit the same gear, so the 3 of them share that, that saved a lot of money too :)
When i met Marlyn (before we had kids) I asked here to go on her first trip with me (I had a bike before I met her back then), and we went on a 2 week ride from Norway to Italy and back (venice) through the alps and all that. Was super fun, and I think it's pretty cool of her to say yes to a 2 week trip as passenger :)
That bike is $8,000 here. Cheap, but not too cheap! The gear you are wearing (boots, gloves, pants and jackets, and helmets) aren't cheap here either! Fun hobby, nevertheless. :-) Enjoy, and ride with care!
It's been 10 years since I last had a motorcycle (back then I had a KTM 990cc).
Here I am with my daughter on the new bike :)
My kids love to go for rides, so does Marlyn as well, so it's a lot of fun for all of us.
It's been 10 years since I last had a motorcycle (back then I had a KTM 990cc).
Here I am with my daughter on it :)
My kids love to go for rides, so does Marlyn as well, so it's a lot of fun for all of us.
Blackberries
The search engine is broken:
> Error error parsing created field: parsing time "1689093798000000000" as "2006-01-02T15:04:05Z07:00": cannot parse "093798000000000" as "-"
I was thinking back to CD players. Switching tracks took a moment, although I don’t know anymore how long exactly. IIRC, playing CDs on a computer was a bit slower than in a dedicated player.
Don’t worry, switching to the next OGG file on my disk is basically instant. 😅
I was thinking back to CD players. Switching tracks took a moment, although I don’t know anymore how long exactly. IIRC, playing CDs on a computer was a bit slower than in a dedicated player.
Don’t worry, switching to the next OGG file on my disk is basically instant. 😅
I was thinking back to CD players. Switching tracks took a moment, although I don’t know anymore how long exactly. IIRC, playing CDs on a computer was a bit slower than in a dedicated player.
Don’t worry, switching to the next OGG file on my disk is basically instant. 😅
I was thinking back to CD players. Switching tracks took a moment, although I don’t know anymore how long exactly. IIRC, playing CDs on a computer was a bit slower than in a dedicated player.
Don’t worry, switching to the next OGG file on my disk is basically instant. 😅
Oh, AEST! No idea, but it might have been @xuu. LOL.
~
~
Don’t get me wrong, it is attractive, until my Internets are threaten. Then all bets are off. 😂
Bloody sunset
That’s what I meant by “absolute” performance: A human being tolerates a system boot up time of 0.5-2 minutes, for example, so there’s an absolute/fixed duration that any task is allowed to take. Boot: 0.5-2 minutes. Opening Word: 1-10 seconds. Saving an image file: 1-10 seconds. Time until the next song starts to play when you click “next track”: 0-5 seconds. Stuff like that. As long as we don’t exceed those durations, people will be more or less happy.
Wasted potential? Ab-so-fucken-lutely.
(Maybe I’m repeating myself. I’m tired. Sorry. 😅)
That’s what I meant by “absolute” performance: A human being tolerates a system boot up time of 0.5-2 minutes, for example, so there’s an absolute/fixed duration that any task is allowed to take. Boot: 0.5-2 minutes. Opening Word: 1-10 seconds. Saving an image file: 1-10 seconds. Time until the next song starts to play when you click “next track”: 0-5 seconds. Stuff like that. As long as we don’t exceed those durations, people will be more or less happy.
Wasted potential? Ab-so-fucken-lutely.
(Maybe I’m repeating myself. I’m tired. Sorry. 😅)
That’s what I meant by “absolute” performance: A human being tolerates a system boot up time of 0.5-2 minutes, for example, so there’s an absolute/fixed duration that any task is allowed to take. Boot: 0.5-2 minutes. Opening Word: 1-10 seconds. Saving an image file: 1-10 seconds. Time until the next song starts to play when you click “next track”: 0-5 seconds. Stuff like that. As long as we don’t exceed those durations, people will be more or less happy.
Wasted potential? Ab-so-fucken-lutely.
(Maybe I’m repeating myself. I’m tired. Sorry. 😅)
That’s what I meant by “absolute” performance: A human being tolerates a system boot up time of 0.5-2 minutes, for example, so there’s an absolute/fixed duration that any task is allowed to take. Boot: 0.5-2 minutes. Opening Word: 1-10 seconds. Saving an image file: 1-10 seconds. Time until the next song starts to play when you click “next track”: 0-5 seconds. Stuff like that. As long as we don’t exceed those durations, people will be more or less happy.
Wasted potential? Ab-so-fucken-lutely.
(Maybe I’m repeating myself. I’m tired. Sorry. 😅)
(His twts have been synced to your yarnd by yarnd's gossip protocol.)
> On researching I see that HTTPS (tcp 443) traffic is continuing and originating from you NAT IP address 100.64.x.x
> This was further found to be originating from your firewall/router at 192.168.x.x (MAC D8:58:D7:x:x:x).
> This abuse is continuing and constitues a violation of \n Acceptable Use Policy and Terms of Service.
> Please take action to identify the source of the abuse and prevent it from continuing.
> Failure to stop the abuse may result in suspension or cancellation of service.
>
> Thank you,
> On researching I see that HTTPS (tcp 443) traffic is continuing and originating from you NAT IP address 100.64.x.x
> This was further found to be originating from your firewall/router at 192.168.x.x (MAC D8:58:D7:x:x:x).
> This abuse is continuing and constitues a violation of Senawave's Acceptable Use Policy and Terms of Service.
> Please take action to identify the source of the abuse and prevent it from continuing.
> Failure to stop the abuse may result in suspension or cancellation of service.
>
> Thank you,
> On researching I see that HTTPS (tcp 443) traffic is continuing and originating from you NAT IP address 100.64.x.x
> This was further found to be originating from your firewall/router at 192.168.x.x (MAC D8:58:D7:x:x:x).
> This abuse is continuing and constitues a violation of [ISP] Acceptable Use Policy and Terms of Service.
> Please take action to identify the source of the abuse and prevent it from continuing.
> Failure to stop the abuse may result in suspension or cancellation of service.
>
> Thank you,
> On researching I see that HTTPS (tcp 443) traffic is continuing and originating from you NAT IP address 100.64.x.x
> This was further found to be originating from your firewall/router at 192.168.x.x (MAC D8:58:D7:x:x:x).
> This abuse is continuing and constitues a violation of [ISP] Acceptable Use Policy and Terms of Service.
> Please take action to identify the source of the abuse and prevent it from continuing.
> Failure to stop the abuse may result in suspension or cancellation of service.
>
> Thank you,
> Hey so.. i just got an email from my ISP saying they will terminate my service. Did i break something @abucci ?
>
> – https://txt.sour.is/twt/oohzbqa
$ (echo "URL Bytes"; sort -n -k 2 -r < avatars.txt | head) | column -t
URL Bytes
https://birkbak.neocities.org/avatar.jpg 667640
https://darch.neocities.org/avatar.png 652960
http://darch.dk/avatar.png 603210
https://social.naln1.ca/media/0c4f65a4be32ff3caf54efb60166a8c965cc6ac7c30a0efd1e51c307b087f47b.png 327947
...
But so far nothing much... Still running the search...
$ (echo "URL Bytes"; sort -n -k 2 -r < avatars.txt | head) | column -t
URL Bytes
https://birkbak.neocities.org/avatar.jpg 667640
https://darch.neocities.org/avatar.png 652960
http://darch.dk/avatar.png 603210
https://social.naln1.ca/media/0c4f65a4be32ff3caf54efb60166a8c965cc6ac7c30a0efd1e51c307b087f47b.png 327947
...
But so far nothing much... Still running the search...