# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 235518
# self = https://watcher.sour.is?offset=229393
# next = https://watcher.sour.is?offset=229493
# prev = https://watcher.sour.is?offset=229293
@doesnmppsflt It looks like it... Although they shouldn't be empty since Timeline took care of sending those. I believe I have an idea as to why that happened, but will have to test before filing an issue.
@lyse HAHA! A forever stable major release eh? That's brilliant 😃 ...
@lyse HAHA! A forever stable major release eh? That's brilliant 😃 ...
My webmention script are the same as Timeline
Your mention is... empty?
@doesnm.p.psf.lt I don't know if you have already noticed, but your Twtxt/Webmention script outputs Timestamps from the future 🤔 I wonder if Timeline's does the same ...
I'm sitting in official cabal.club with nicknames doesnm and doesnm-seed from vps because can't install cli in Termux
[47°09′48″S, 126°43′05″W] Transfer aborted
Noice! 
Mention sent successfully
I've been using nile, my alternative WM for #plan9, for over a decade now. I just made some additional improvements and finally gave it a web page: http://a.9srv.net/src/nile/
I've been using nile, my alternative WM for #plan9, for over a decade now. I just made some additional improvements and finally gave it a web page: http://a.9srv.net/src/nile/
[47°09′05″S, 126°43′10″W] Transfer 25% complete...
curl: (3) URL rejected: Malformed input to a URL function. Writing sender in bash was BAD idea
@prologic I say we should find a way to support mentions with only url, no nick, as per the original spec.
- For @<nick url> we already got support
- For @<nick> the posting client should expand it to @<nick url>, if not then the reading client should just render it as @nick with no link.
- For @<url> the sending client should try to expand it to @<nick url>, if not then the reading client should try to find or construct a nick base on:
1. Look in twtxt.txt for a nick =
2. Use (sub)domain from URL
3. Use folder or file name from URL
@prologic I say we should find a way to support mentions with only url, no nick, as per the original spec.
- For @<nick url> we already got support
- For @<nick> the posting client should expand it to @<nick url>, if not then the reading client should just render it as @nick with no link.
- For @<url> the sending client should try to expand it to @<nick url>, if not then the reading client should try to find or construct a nick base on:
1. Look in twtxt.txt for a nick =
2. Use (sub)domain from URL
3. Use folder or file name from URL
@prologic I say we should find a way to support mentions with only url, no nick, as per the original spec.
- For @<nick url> we already got support
- For @<nick> the posting client should expand it to @<nick url>, if not then the reading client should just render it as @nick with no link.
- For @<url> the sending client should try to expand it to @<nick url>, if not then the reading client should try to find or construct a nick base on:
1. Look in twtxt.txt for a nick =
2. Use (sub)domain from URL
3. Use folder or file name from URL
@prologic I say we should find a way to support mentions with only url, no nick, as per the original spec.
- For @<nick url> we already got support
- For @<nick> the posting client should expand it to @<nick url>, if not then the reading client should just render it as @nick with no link.
- For @<url> the sending client should try to expand it to @<nick url>, if not then the reading client should try to find or construct a nick base on:
1. Look in twtxt.txt for a nick =
2. Use (sub)domain from URL
3. Use folder or file name from URL
[47°09′42″S, 126°43′01″W] Waiting for carrier
Pinellas County Running: 5.03 miles, 00:09:19 average pace, 00:46:55 duration
easy five to complete the first week of marathon training. my left glute/hip had some twinges
#running
Pinellas County Running: 5.03 miles, 00:09:19 average pace, 00:46:55 duration
easy five to complete the first week of marathon training. my left glute/hip had some twinges
#running
Pinellas County Running: 5.03 miles, 00:09:19 average pace, 00:46:55 duration
easy five to complete the first week of marathon training. my left glute/hip had some twinges
#running
@prologic This is fricking amazing, congratulations! :-) \\o/
@prologic This is fricking amazing, congratulations! :-) \o/
@lyse Just watched this too! Not too bad 👌
@lyse Just watched this too! Not too bad 👌
[47°09′00″S, 126°43′58″W] Carrier too weak
@lyse That was great! 😃 Now I need to go back and watch the other videos by that guy. 😅
@lyse That was great! 😃 Now I need to go back and watch the other videos by that guy. 😅
@lyse That was great! 😃 Now I need to go back and watch the other videos by that guy. 😅
@lyse That was great! 😃 Now I need to go back and watch the other videos by that guy. 😅
I am now fully off Cloudflare 🥳
I am now fully off Cloudflare 🥳
[47°09′00″S, 126°43′14″W] Bad satellite signal -- switching to analog communication
So Go lang is at a funny version huh' v1.23.4 will there ever be a v1.23.45678? 🫠🤡
So Go lang is at a funny version huh' v1.23.4 will there ever be a v1.23.45678? 🫠🤡
@lyse ahhh thank you so so much!!!! i've heard of shellcheck but haven't checked it out properly - will try it for my scripts :D i really appreciate it
@lyse ahhh thank you so so much!!!! i've heard of shellcheck but haven't checked it out properly - will try it for my scripts :D i really appreciate it
@shreyan Yeah the guy seems quite mad and hell bent on destroying his reputation and his project 🤦♂️
@shreyan Yeah the guy seems quite mad and hell bent on destroying his reputation and his project 🤦♂️
@prologic Extremely, this whole episode has been insane
Hello again, spent a long time inactive!
@ no. It is jest. Just like The Onion, but exclusively for a fictitious company. 😂
@slashdot Matt really is a fucking idiot 🤦♂️ Right? 🤔
@slashdot Matt really is a fucking idiot 🤦♂️ Right? 🤔
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:2 TWTS:1212 ARCHIVED:84140 CACHE:2965 FOLLOWERS:17 FOLLOWING:14
That's a well done mapping of computer time scale to human time scale: https://youtu.be/PpaQrzoDW2I Matt Godbolt is also a guy that I just enjoy listening to.
@movq Hmm yeah, you're right. I should have checked for our location prior to getting too excited.
@aelaraji Yeah, a sore neck is always a win. :-P Here's nothing really to see, all cloudy. And also a bit cold at -2°C. I don't feel like standing still all that long outside at the moment. :-D
Couldn't see shi_, but enjoyed observing the moon light slipping trough the fast moving clouds! I'll take that as a win 👍
> /Me came back with a soar neck ..._
Couldn't see shi_, but enjoyed observing the moon light slipping trough the fast moving clouds! I'll take that as a win 👍
> /Me came back with a soar neck ..._
@lyse /Me throws his keyboard off to the side, grabs his camera just in case and runs upstairs screaming "Yeah! Science B_ !"_
@lyse /Me throws his keyboard off to the side, grabs his camera just in case and runs upstairs screaming "Yeah! Science B_ !"_
@lyse Hmm, their illustration looks pretty optimistic. 🤔 When I look at it in Stellarium, the cluster around Saturn is pretty close to the Sun. Not sure you can see them. 🤔 Saturn is even closer to the Sun than Mercury – and Mercury is notoriously hard to observe.
But I hope I’m wrong!
January looks pretty interesting, too, btw.
@lyse Hmm, their illustration looks pretty optimistic. 🤔 When I look at it in Stellarium, the cluster around Saturn is pretty close to the Sun. Not sure you can see them. 🤔 Saturn is even closer to the Sun than Mercury – and Mercury is notoriously hard to observe.
But I hope I’m wrong!
January looks pretty interesting, too, btw.
@lyse Hmm, their illustration looks pretty optimistic. 🤔 When I look at it in Stellarium, the cluster around Saturn is pretty close to the Sun. Not sure you can see them. 🤔 Saturn is even closer to the Sun than Mercury – and Mercury is notoriously hard to observe.
But I hope I’m wrong!
January looks pretty interesting, too, btw.
@lyse Hmm, their illustration looks pretty optimistic. 🤔 When I look at it in Stellarium, the cluster around Saturn is pretty close to the Sun. Not sure you can see them. 🤔 Saturn is even closer to the Sun than Mercury – and Mercury is notoriously hard to observe.
But I hope I’m wrong!
January looks pretty interesting, too, btw.
[47°09′52″S, 126°43′11″W] --bad checksum--
Your code apparently works just fine. Until it @doesnm't. ;-) The shell languages are weird and having some strange properties that one is just not used to when coming from other languages.