It's very likely that I'm wrong in all this, can anyone familiar with Signal or Telegram confirm?
Signal requires a phone number to sign up, and I believe that you can connect it to your contact list on your phone to find other people using Signal. If this is the case, wouldn't they have to store at least a hash of your phone number? Hashed information is listed elsewhere in the document.
> And yes, you can argue that there are legal and moral reasons to use a privacy coin. But these coins are running up against the same problem as encryption and other technologies to protect privacy: They can’t allow for dissidents, activists, and people from marginalized communities to stay safe without also sheltering criminals and purveyors of hate.
https://slate.com/technology/2021/11/monero-privacy-coin-racists-cybercriminals.html
https://slate.com/technology/2021/11/monero-privacy-coin-racists-cybercriminals.html
> ...yes, you can argue that there are legal and moral reasons to use a privacy coin. But these coins are running up against the same problem as encryption and other technologies to protect privacy: They can’t allow for dissidents, activists, and people from marginalized communities to stay safe without also sheltering criminals and purveyors of hate.
https://slate.com/technology/2021/11/monero-privacy-coin-racists-cybercriminals.html
https://slate.com/technology/2021/11/monero-privacy-coin-racists-cybercriminals.html
- A "Twitter style" open microblogging system that allows people to discard and create identities with little consequences
- A "Facebook style" closed-off system that is more focused on real people interacting with each other instead of their online personas
- An "Internet forum style" system that focuses on discussion above all else
1. The example of image sharing can easily be solved by creating a private file hosting service that doesn't suck like @lyse said
2. We are getting close to the original purpose of Facebook here. A social media service based on identities rather than accounts and designed for people who know each other in meatspace to connect online. Facebook already does what we're talking about well; it has strong access controls to only show your content to people you choose. The only problem, of course, is that Facebook is evil.
<meta name="robots" content="noindex, ofollow">
on for good measure. Nobody I'm sharing it with has to sign up for anything, no entity outside my control is compressing the images, screwing with the metadata, or facially recognizing anyone, and you can just right click > save as if you want to download them.
--base-url https://yarn.algorave.dk
to your command line options for yarnd
> As I'm typing it, though, it seems like an extremely complicated solution to a problem that isn't all that bad.
Poor wording. Feedjacking would be a pretty bad problem. I meant that it might be best to keep things as they are without adding any crazy url switching.
> Hijack it how?
Wouldn't they be able to make their own posts that would appear as having come from your account?
url
field is replaced by a canonical
field and an alternate
field. If the location that the client has of Feed A doesn't match what it says in Feed A's canonical
field, the client downloads the canonical feed, Feed B, once to make sure that the location of Feed A appears in Feed B's alternate
tags. If so, the client will continue to follow Feed A but it will use the canonical URL for hashing.\nAs I'm typing it, though, it seems like an extremely complicated solution to a problem that isn't all that bad.
url
field is replaced by a canonical
field and an alternate
field. If the location that the client has of Feed A doesn't match what it says in Feed A's canonical
field, the client downloads the canonical feed, Feed B, once to make sure that the location of Feed A appears in Feed B's alternate
tags. If so, the client will continue to follow Feed A but it will use the canonical URL for hashing.As I'm typing it, though, it seems like an extremely complicated solution to a problem that isn't all that bad.
# url = https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt
to their feed?
> I understand how this can create confusion. Does Yarn respect url metadata entries as specified on dev.twtxt.net?
> The Times reports that Peter Brown, a professor at the University of Western Ontario, places the odds of a meteor crashing into someone's bed at 1 in 100 billion.
I would really like to hear Peter Brown tell us how he came to that conclusion.
> Let’s just say, I’ve seen this happen with multiple products at work: Step 1, someone builds something which doesn’t support a “reply” feature at all. Step 2, the thing grows, now people want “reply”. Step 3, it gets confusing with all the linear replies and now people want “full threading”. 😁 That’s also basically what happened to twtxt/yarn. Maybe, over time, everything evolves into Usenet. 🤣
@movq was right.
> Not only is it free to use, but I no longer have to worry about trust, because the operator of the technology is me.
Of course Amazon would never snoop on what you're doing with the service they provide to you for free. They wouldn't do that! They're a "reputable and widely trusted cloud provider" based in a Five Eyes country known for their data security!
Nobody told this guy about Mullvad or iVPN. Plus, if you're doing it right, you don't need that Netflix subscription.
I'm sure it would be more profitable for them to do so. That just makes me wonder why they haven't done it already. I wonder if there's Google money involved (like the default search engine deal with Mozilla) so they can claim they aren't a monopoly.
printf "* [%s: %s](%s)\n", Y, tmrsl[trm], f
Makes sense now.
printf "* [%s: %s](%s)\\n", Y, tmrsl[trm], f
\nMakes sense now.
smu
installed to run the script and I figured that markdown was being generated somewhere but I don't know where that is or what purpose it serves.
awk
to avoid the dumpster fire below. \n\ntimestamp=$(echo "$line" | grep -Eo '^[0-9]{4}-[01][0-9]-[0-3][0-9][Tt][0-2][0-9]:[0-5][0-9]:[0-5][0-9](\\.[0-9]+)?([+-][0-2][0-9]:[0-5][0-9]|Zz)')\ntwt=$(echo "$line" | sed -e 's/"/\\"/g; s/
/\\/g' | cut -f 2- -)\nhyperlinked=$(echo "$twt" | sed 's|http://[^ ]*[^ ,.;:)>}!]|<a href="&">&</a>|g; s|https://[^ ]*[^ ,.;:)>}!]|<a href="&">&</a>|g')\n
awk
to avoid the dumpster fire below.
timestamp=$(echo "$line" | grep -Eo '^[0-9]{4}-[01][0-9]-[0-3][0-9][Tt][0-2][0-9]:[0-5][0-9]:[0-5][0-9](\.[0-9]+)?([+-][0-2][0-9]:[0-5][0-9]|Zz)')
twt=$(echo "$line" | sed -e 's/"/\"/g; s/
/\ -)
hyperlinked=$(echo "$twt" | sed 's|http://[^ ]*[^ ,.;:)>}!]|<a href="&">&</a>|g; s|https://[^ ]*[^ ,.;:)>}!]|<a href="&">&</a>|g')
smu
used for?
> I assumed all lines start with a date
So did I in my attempt, but even after a quick
grep -v '^#'
it would still break everything.I'm trying out the newer version now. Will report back.
grep -v '^#'
it would still break everything.\nI'm trying out the newer version now. Will report back.
Do any of you gentlemen have experience with those clients? Please tell me what you think of them, or if I would be better off recommending something else. Thank you.
Funnily enough, GNU
tail
has no -r option: https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/html_node/tail-invocation> GNU tail can output any amount of data (some other versions of tail cannot). It also has no -r option (print in reverse), since reversing a file is really a different job from printing the end of a file; BSD tail (which is the one with -r) can only reverse files that are at most as large as its buffer, which is typically 32 KiB. A more reliable and versatile way to reverse files is the GNU tac command.
tail
has no -r option: https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/html_node/tail-invocation\n> GNU tail can output any amount of data (some other versions of tail cannot). It also has no -r option (print in reverse), since reversing a file is really a different job from printing the end of a file; BSD tail (which is the one with -r) can only reverse files that are at most as large as its buffer, which is typically 32 KiB. A more reliable and versatile way to reverse files is the GNU tac command.
ed
are not specified in the POSIX standard. Interestingly, GNU also added --longer-option-names for the standard -p and -s. https://www.gnu.org/software/ed/manual/ed_manual.html#Invoking-ed https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799.2018edition/utilities/ed.html
ed
are not specified in the POSIX standard. Interestingly, GNU also added --longer-option-names for the standard -p and -s. https://www.gnu.org/software/ed/manual/ed_manual.html#Invoking-ed https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799.2018edition/utilities/ed.html
The image search is very nice. The image resolution is printed right there on the image matrix. There are good search options available like a "Transparent" image type which I've only seen on DuckDuckGo before.
Searching for text is completely usable with JavaScript disabled but it needs to be enabled for image search.
There isn't much information on the home page and the links at the bottom go to pages that require far too much JavaScript to load. Is this just a personal wiki service that functions like a centralized TiddlyWiki or is there something more?
> I think I have a cold
Shhh, don't let the government know! ;)